COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH

OVERSIGHT DIVISION



FISCAL NOTE



L.R. No.: 3335-01

Bill No.: SB 824

Subject: County Government; Cities, Towns and Villages; Elderly; Taxation and Revenue - Property

Type: Original

Date: January 4, 2002




FISCAL SUMMARY



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON STATE FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005
General Revenue*

**

$0



($43,791,000)


($46,004,000)
Blind Pension ** $0 ($219,000) ($230,000)
Total Estimated

Net Effect on All

State Funds*

**

$0



($44,010,000)
($46,234,000)

*Does not include possible increased cost to fully fund Foundation Formula

**Subject to appropriation

ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005
Total Estimated

Net Effect on All

Federal Funds

$0 $0 $0

Numbers within parentheses: ( ) indicate costs or losses.

This fiscal note contains 5 pages.

ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005
Political subdivisions ** $0 $0 $0
Local Government $0 $0 $0

**Offsetting costs from reduction of tax revenues, and state reimbursements.

Numbers within parentheses: ( ) indicate costs or losses.



FISCAL ANALYSIS



ASSUMPTION



Officials from the Office of Administration and the State Auditor's Office assume this proposal would have no impact on their organizations.



Officials from the Department of Revenue assume no administrative impact on their organization.



Officials from the State Tax Commission assume residential property assessed valuation is $30 billion. In the year of reassessment statewide increase of residential property is 8%. 70% of residential properties are owner occupied and 24% of residences contain a member who is 65 years and older. Statewide levy is $6 per $100 assessed valuation.



Calculations are as follows: $30 billion assessed valuation times 8% increase equals $2.4 billion increase. $2.4 billion times 70% owner occupied is $1.68 billion times 24% senior citizens equals $400 million times $6 levy equals $24 million in revenues the state would need to replace.



Oversight estimated possible losses as follows.



Residential Property Tax paid in 2000 $1,725,846,000

Projected Tax 2001 $1,915,689,000

Projected Increase $ 189,843,000

Percent elderly x .269

Projected Increase for 64+ Occupied $ 51,068,000

Percent owner occupied x .70

Projected Increase for 64+ owner-occupied $ 35,748,000



Estimated CY 2002 Loss: $35,748,000 x 1.035 x 1.015 = $37,554,000



ASSUMPTION (continued)



The proposal would become effective for year beginning January 1, 2003, and Oversight assumes reimbursements for political subdivisions' calendar years would be from immediately following state fiscal years.



CY 2003: $37,554,000 x 1.11 x 1.035 x 1.015 = $43,791,000



CY 2004: $43,791,000 x 1.035 x 1.015 = $46,004,000



Oversight assumes there would also be losses to the Blind Pension fund of a little more than ½ of 1% of the losses to political subdivisions.



In response to a similar proposal in the prior session, Department of Elementary and Secondary Education officials noted that the proposal would decrease assessed values compared to current law, which would increase the amount needed to fully fund the Foundation Formula. They also noted that 1) "hold harmless" districts would recoup their losses through state payments, 2) state payments required by this proposal are not included in the Formula, thus allowing other districts a "double dip" consisting of reimbursements from the state and increased payments through a fully funded Formula, and 3) the effects of the proposal on the Formula should disappear after three or so years because reducing the guaranteed tax base reduces the inflationary adjustment in the Formula for districts to fund inflationary increases in expenses.



Oversight assumes the Foundation Formula issues, if any, would be addressed through the appropriation process.



FISCAL IMPACT - State Government FY 2003

(6 Mo.)

FY 2004 FY 2005
GENERAL REVENUE
Cost - Reimbursements to Political Subdivisions*



$0


($43,791,000)


($46,004,000)
NET EFFECT ON GENERAL REVENUE FUND*

$0


($43,791,000)


($46,004,000)
*Does not include possible increase in cost to fully fund Foundation Formula.
BLIND PENSION FUND
Loss - Reduced Collections $0 ($219,000) ($230,000)
NET EFFECT ON BLIND PENSION FUND

$0


($219,000)


($230,000)
FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government FY 2003

(6 Mo.)

FY 2004 FY 2005
POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS
Income - Reimbursements from State* $0 $43,791,000 $46,004,000
Loss - Reduced Property Tax Collections $0 ($43,791,000) ($46,004,000)
NET EFFECT ON POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS*



$0


$0


$0
*Does not include possible increased distributions to school districts.


FISCAL IMPACT - Small Business



No direct fiscal impact to small businesses would be expected as a result of this proposal.



DESCRIPTION



This proposal would exempt the principal residence of persons over sixty-four years of age from increases in property tax due to either increases in assessed values or increases in tax rates.



The state would reimburse political subdivisions for tax losses as certified by the State Auditor.

This proposal would apply to tax years beginning on and after January 1, 2003.



This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not require additional capital improvements or rental space. This proposal would affect total state revenue.



SOURCES OF INFORMATION

Department of Revenue

State Tax Commission

Office of Administration

State Auditor's Office





Mickey Wilson, CPA

Acting Director

January 4, 2002