COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH

OVERSIGHT DIVISION



FISCAL NOTE



L.R. No.: 3120-01

Bill No.: SB 844

Subject: Taxation & Revenue-Property; County Government; Cities, Towns & Villages

Type: Original

Date: January 14, 2002




FISCAL SUMMARY



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON STATE FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005
Blind Pension 0 ($1,040,000) $195,000
Total Estimated

Net Effect on All

State Funds

$0 ($1,040,000) $195,000



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005
Total Estimated

Net Effect on All

Federal Funds

$0 $0 $0



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005
Political Subdivisions 0 ($208,100,000) $38,900,000
Local Government $0 ($208,100,000) $38,900,000

Numbers within parentheses: ( ) indicate costs or losses.

This fiscal note contains 4 pages.

FISCAL ANALYSIS



ASSUMPTION



Officials from the Department of Revenue assume no administrative impact to their organization.

Officials from the State Tax Commission assume total assessed valuation for 2002 is $68 billion. They assume a six percent increase in valuation for the 2003 reassessment, resulting in $4 billion of additional valuation, and $240 million increased revenues for political subdivisions at an average $6 tax rate. The State Tax Commission assumes a statewide average of six percent property ownership change, which would result in an average 15% increase in value for those properties. Acquisition-based reassessment would result in $40 million in increased revenues to local political subdivisions, and the loss of $240 million in potential revenue, for a net $200 million statewide loss for local governments.



Oversight assumes there would also be losses to the Blind Pension Fund as a result of this proposal. Oversight also assumes the first year affected by the proposal would be calendar year 2003 taxes collected in FY 2004. Further there would be increasing fluctuation in assessed valuation changes because of the cumulative effect of deferred reassessment. Residential properties reassessed after several years would have large increases in assessed valuation when ownership changes.



Oversight calculates the fiscal impact of this proposal as follows:



Assessed valuation for 2002 $68,000,000,000



Estimated local tax collections lost for 2003 without reassessment

6% of $68 Billion x $6 per hundred ($244,800,000)



Estimated 2003 local tax collections increased due to ownership change

6% of 15% of $68 Billion x $6 per hundred $36,700,000



Net local tax loss in 2003

($244,800,000 less $36,700,000) ($208,100,000)



Local tax gain in 2004

($36,700,000 plus 6%) $38,900,000



ASSUMPTION (continued)



Estimated Blind Pension Fund tax collections lost for 2003 without reassessment

(6% of $68 Billion x 3 cents per hundred) ($1,224,000)



Estimated 2003 Blind Pension Fund tax collections increased due to ownership change

(6% of 15% of $68 Billion x 3 cents per hundred) $184,000



Net Blind Pension Fund tax loss in 2003

($1,224,000 less $183,600) ($1,040,000)



Blind Pension Fund tax gain in 2004

($184,000 plus 6%) $195,000



FISCAL IMPACT - State Government FY 2003

(10 Mo.)

FY 2004 FY 2005
BLIND PENSION FUND
Loss - Reduced Property Tax $0 ($1,040,000) $195,000
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON BLIND PENSION FUND



$0


($1,040,000)


$195,000


FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government FY 2003

(10 Mo.)

FY 2004 FY 2005
POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS
Loss - Reduced Property Tax $0 ($208,100,000) $38,900,000
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS



$0


($208,100,000)


$38,900,000


FISCAL IMPACT - Small Business



No direct fiscal impact to small businesses would be expected as a result of this proposal.



DESCRIPTION



This proposal would prohibit reassessment of previously assessed real property and improvements until a transfer of ownership occurs.



This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not require additional capital improvements or rental space. This proposal would affect total state revenue.



SOURCES OF INFORMATION

Department of Revenue

State Tax Commission



NOT RESPONDING

Office of Administration

Division of Budget and Planning







Mickey Wilson, CPA

Acting Director

January 14, 2002