COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH

OVERSIGHT DIVISION



FISCAL NOTE



L.R. No.: 2863-01

Bill No.: SB 678

Subject: Teachers, Elementary and Secondary Education Dept; Education, Higher

Type: Original

Date: January 28, 2002




FISCAL SUMMARY



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON STATE FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005
Total Estimated

Net Effect on All

State Funds

$0 $0 $0



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005
Total Estimated

Net Effect on All

Federal Funds

$0 $0 $0



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005
Local Government $0 $0 $0

Numbers within parentheses: ( ) indicate costs or losses.

This fiscal note contains 3 pages.



FISCAL ANALYSIS



ASSUMPTION



Officials from the Coordinating Board of Higher Education (CBH) indicated there would be no fiscal impact to CBH as a result of this proposed legislation.



Officials from the Kansas City Missouri Public School District stated there would be no fiscal impact to the District.



Officials from the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education stated that since the proposal is permissive, there would be no fiscal impact on the agency. However, there could be a cost to the charter schools to retain the accrediting agency.



FISCAL IMPACT - State Government FY 2003

(10 Mo.)

FY 2004 FY 2005
$0 $0 $0



FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government FY 2003

(10 Mo.)

FY 2004 FY 2005
$0 $0 $0

FISCAL IMPACT - Small Business



Charter schools, although receiving state aid, are governed by private boards and may be operated by either profit or not-for profit entities. Charter schools may incur expenses associated with retaining an accrediting agency, but since the language in the proposal gives charter schools options regarding showing compliance with standards, no fiscal impact is assumed.



DESCRIPTION



This proposed legislation provides that the state board of education shall establish a process whereby a charter school may be evaluated for compliance with applicable school-level standards of the Missouri school improvement program review. Every charter school located in an urban school district shall demonstrate compliance with the standards established by the state board of education or provide documentation of accreditation by an independent accrediting agency.





DESCRIPTION (continued)



This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not require additional capital improvements or rental space.



SOURCES OF INFORMATION



Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Coordinating Board of Higher Education

Kansas City Missouri Public School District



Not Responding



St Louis Public Schools









Mickey Wilson, CPA

Acting Director

January 28, 2002