COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH
OVERSIGHT DIVISION
FISCAL NOTE
L.R. No.: 2652-03
Bill No.: SCS for SB 651
Subject: Health Care; Health Care Professionals; Physicians; Insurance - Medical; Medical Procedures and Personnel
Type: Original
Date: January 28, 2002
FISCAL SUMMARY
FUND AFFECTED | FY 2003 | FY 2004 | FY 2005 |
All Funds | $0 to ($11,445,165) | $0 to ($15,107,616) | $0 to ($16,618,379) |
General Revenue* | (Unknown) | (Unknown) | (Unknown) |
Insurance Dedicated | $9,850 | $0 | $0 |
Total Estimated
Net Effect on All State Funds* |
(UNKNOWN) | (UNKNOWN) | (UNKNOWN) |
*Expected to exceed $100,000 annually.
FUND AFFECTED | FY 2003 | FY 2004 | FY 2005 |
Federal* | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Estimated
Net Effect on All Federal Funds |
$0 | $0 | $0 |
*Revenues and expenditures are expected to exceed $100,000 annually and would net to $0.
FUND AFFECTED | FY 2003 | FY 2004 | FY 2005 |
Local Government | $0 to ($2,482,583) | $0 to ($3,277,010) | $0 to ($3,604,711) |
Numbers within parentheses: ( ) indicate costs or losses.
This fiscal note contains 6 pages.
ASSUMPTION
Officials from the Department of Transportation, the Department of Conservation, and the Department of Public Safety - Missouri State Highway Patrol assume this proposal would not fiscally impact their agencies.
Officials from the Department of Social Services - Division of Medical Services (DMS) state the proposal affects them because DMS administers a managed care program which contracts with health maintenance organizations (HMO) for the purpose of providing health care services through capitated rates. These HMOs would be subject to the regulations in this proposal.
DMS states the proposal mandates that plans cannot prohibit or limit a health care provider willing to accept the plan's operating terms and conditions, its schedule of fees, covered expenses, utilization regulations and quality standards, from the opportunity to participate in that plan. DMS states this is essentially "any willing provider" language. "Any willing provider" language reduces a plan's ability to negotiate aggressive rates based on guaranteed volume because the potential for guaranteed volume is reduced when the number of providers cannot be
strictly controlled. This affects the entity paying the plans to operate the program which in the
case of the managed care program is DMS.
DMS estimates there would be fiscal impact to DMS because of this proposal. The proposal affects the shape of the plans' networks and also reduces the ability of the plans to negotiate terms. DMS states it is not possible to estimate the amount of the impact at this time. The cost impact would be incurred when bids are made by the plans because they would include the increased cost in their bid. Capitation payments to managed care plans in FY2001 were more than $447 million. For the sake of perspective, an increase of just one percent in the cap rate would result in an additional annual cost of $4.5 million.
Missouri Consolidated Health Care Plan (HCP) officials state that competition fuels the contract negotiations between a physician and a medical plan. Typically, providers give discounts in exchange for patient volume. If every physician participates in a health plan, the carrier is limited on controlling costs. The participating physicians may also refuse to participate if the volume is no longer guaranteed and the prices would start to escalate. This would result in significant cost to the plans that would recoup these costs through increased premiums.
According to opponents in Minnesota, the "Any Willing Provider" Law could increase costs as much as 29%. A few years ago, several studies were done on this issue with a wide range of
impacts. A study by the Barents Group, LLC of KPMG Peat Marwick, LLP for the Alliance for Managed Care states the impact to be about 15 percent. Another study done by Atkinson and Company estimates the impact to be between 9.1 and 28.7 percent. MCP will assume a rather
ASSUMPTION (continued)
conservative approach on the impact of this legislation and use 10%.
In 2001 managed care plans requiring a gatekeeper and having no out of network option cost a total of $171,628,742 for the state members and $29,417,723 for the Public Entities. Currently, the state contributes approximately 74% toward the state member's premium. The total fiscal impact for the first year could be $12,700,460 for the state portion and $2,941,772 for the Public Entity portion, including the member's portion.
HCP states that this Senate Committee Substitute expands the definition of "health carrier" to include any entity subject to the Missouri Department of Insurance laws. This would subject accident and sickness policies, health services corporations, HMO's and other entities to abide by the any willing provider law. HCP assumes HCP's PPO plans would then be subject to the any willing provider language. Even though the PPO plans are typically more liberal in providing contracting and member benefits, HCP assumes there would be a cost associated with the provision under PPO plans. HCP states providers may hesitate to sign a contract for the PPO at a discounted rate if any provider who meets the requirements may join. HCP states the perk of additional patients associated with participating with the plan would be eliminated. HCP estimates an additional cost to the state at 3% of the PPO cost or $1,033,737 for the first year. The Public Entities insured through HCP's PPO could see additional cost s of 3% or $37,328 for the first year.
Oversight assumes a ten percent increase per year.
Department of Insurance (INS) officials state that insurers and HMOs would be required to amend their policies to comply with this legislation. Amendments must be filed with INS. INS estimates that 171 insurers and 26 HMOs would be required to file at least one amendment to their policy form with a filing fee of $50, resulting in revenue of $9,850 in FY 2003. INS has reached capacity in policy form reviews and the additional workload created by this legislation would cause delays in policy form reviews. Additional staff are not being requested with this single proposal, but if multiple proposals pass during the legislative session which require policy form amendments, the department would need to request additional staff to handle the increase in workload.
FISCAL IMPACT - State Government | FY 2003
(10 Mo.) |
FY 2004 | FY 2005 |
ALL FUNDS | |||
Cost - All Funds | |||
Increased state contributions | $0 to ($11,445,165) | $0 to ($15,107,616) | $0 to ($16,618,379) |
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON ALL | |||
FUNDS | $0 to ($11,445,165) | $0 to ($15,107,616) | $0 to ($16,618,379) |
GENERAL REVENUE FUND | |||
Cost - Department of Social Service | |||
Medical assistance payments* | (unknown) | (unknown) | (unknown) |
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON | |||
GENERAL REVENUE FUND* | (UNKNOWN) | (UNKNOWN) | (UNKNOWN) |
*Expected to exceed $100,000 annually. | |||
INSURANCE DEDICATED FUND | |||
Income - Department of Insurance | |||
Form filing fees | $9,850 | $0 | $0 |
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON | |||
INSURANCE DEDICATED FUND | $9,850 | $0 | $0 |
FEDERAL FUNDS | |||
Income - Department of Social Services | |||
Medicaid reimbursements * | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown |
Cost - Department of Social Services | |||
Medical assistance payments* | (Unknown) | (Unknown) | (Unknown) |
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON | |||
FEDERAL FUNDS | $0 | $0 | $0 |
*Expected to exceed $100,000 annually |
FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government | FY 2003 | FY 2004 | FY 2005 |
(10 mo.) | |||
POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS | |||
Cost - Political Subdivisions
Increased local contributions |
$0 to |
$0 to |
$0 to |
($2,482,583) | ($3,277,010) | ($3,604,711) | |
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS |
$0 to |
$0 to |
$0 to |
($2,482,583) | ($3,277,010) | ($3,604,711) | |
FISCAL IMPACT - Small Business
Small business practices would expect to be fiscally impacted to the extent they would be able to participate in more health plans.
DESCRIPTION
This proposal requires a health carrier (as defined in section 376.1350) to allow any health care provider to participate in its network if that person satisfies all of the selection standards. This proposal will be known as the Patient Freedom of Choice Act of 2002.
Currently, Section 354.606, RSMo, deals with contracts between health carriers (currently defined as HMOs) and health care professionals (currently defined as physicians or other health care practitioners who provide specific health services). New language provides that health carriers may not develop selection criteria in such a way that it will deny a health care professional the opportunity to become a participating provider if that professional meets all of the selection criteria and is willing to abide by all other terms and conditions. Current language also contains a provision that health carriers do not, however, need to hire more providers than necessary to maintain an adequate network.
This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not require additional capital improvements or rental space.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Department of Transportation
Department of Social Services
Missouri Consolidated Health Care Plan
Department of Insurance
Department of Conservation
Department of Public Safety
Missouri State Highway Patrol
Mickey Wilson, CPA
Acting Director
January 28, 2002