COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH

OVERSIGHT DIVISION



FISCAL NOTE



L.R. No.: 2166-01

Bill No.: SB 615

Subject: Education, Elementary and Secondary: Motor Carriers

Type: Original

Date: March 7, 2001




FISCAL SUMMARY



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON STATE FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004
General Revenue $0 ($0 to $860,427) ($0 to $894,844)
State School Moneys $0 $0 $0
Total Estimated

Net Effect on All

State Funds

$0 ($0 to $860,427) ($0 to $894,844)

- SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATION -

ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004
Total Estimated

Net Effect on All

Federal Funds

$0 $0 $0



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004
Local Government $0 $0 $0

Numbers within parentheses: ( ) indicate costs or losses.

This fiscal note contains 4 pages.

FISCAL ANALYSIS



ASSUMPTION



Officials from the Department of Agriculture and the Department of Natural Resources stated that they did not expect the proposal to affect their agencies.



Officials from the Secretary of State's Office (SOS) assume the rules, regulations and forms issued by the State Board of Education could require as many as 6 pages in the Code of State Regulations. For any given rule, roughly half again as many pages (9) are published in the Missouri Register as in the Code because cost statements, fiscal notes and the like are not repeated in the Code. These costs are estimated. The estimated cost of a page in the Missouri Register is $23. The estimated cost of a page in the Code of State Regulations is $27. The actual costs could be more or less the SOS's estimated cost of $369 for FY 2002. The impact of this legislation in future years is unknown and depends upon the frequency and length of rules, filed, amended, rescinded or withdrawn.



Oversight assumes the SOS could absorb the costs of printing and distributing regulations related to this proposal. If multiple bills pass which require the printing and distribution of regulations at substantial costs, the SOS could request funding through the appropriation process. Any decisions to raise fees to defray costs would likely be made in subsequent fiscal years.



Officials of the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education indicated that the maximum effect of the proposal would be:



2002-03: $132,373,402 x .0065 = $860,427

2003-04: $860,427 x 1.04 = $894,844

2004-05: $894,844 x 1.04 = $930,638

2005-06: $930,638 x 1.04 = $967,863



FISCAL IMPACT - State Government FY 2002

(10 Mo.)

FY 2003 FY 2004
GENERAL REVENUE FUND
Cost - Transfers to State School Moneys Fund $0 ($0 to $860,427) ($0 to $894,844)
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON GENERAL REVENUE FUND $0 ($0 to $860,427) ($0 to $894,844)
- SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATION -
STATE SCHOOL MONEYS FUND
Income - Transfers from General Revenue Fund $0 $0 to $860,427 $0 to $894,844
Cost - Distributions to School Districts $0 ($0 to $860,427) ($0 to $894,844)
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON STATE SCHOOL MONEYS FUND $0 $0 $0



FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government FY 2002

(10 Mo.)

FY 2003 FY 2004
SCHOOL DISTRICTS
Income - Increased State Aid $0 $0 to $860,427 $0 to $894,844
Cost - difference between market price of diesel and cost of biodiesel $0 ($0 to $860,427) ($0 to $894,844)
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON SCHOOL DISTRICTS $0 $0 $0



FISCAL IMPACT - Small Business



Small businesses which are biodiesel fuel distributors, manufacturers or retailers and new generation cooperatives could be affected by this proposal.



DESCRIPTION



This proposal would allow school districts to contract with nonprofit, farmer-owned new generation cooperatives to supply bus fuel containing at least 20% biodiesel during school years 2002-2003 to 2005-2006.



School districts that contract for biodiesel would, subject to appropriation, receive additional state school aid payments so the net price of biodiesel would not exceed the market price for regular diesel fuel.



This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not require additional capital improvements or rental space. The proposal would not affect Total State Revenue.



SOURCES OF INFORMATION



Department of Agriculture

Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Department of Natural Resources

Secretary of State



SOURCES OF INFORMATION (continued)



NOT RESPONDING: Department of Economic Development











Jeanne Jarrett, CPA

Director

March 7, 2001