COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH

OVERSIGHT DIVISION



FISCAL NOTE



L.R. No.: 2110-05

Bill No.: SCS for SB 593

Subject: Interstate Agri-Market Development Center

Type: Original

Date: March 20, 2001




FISCAL SUMMARY



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON STATE FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004
General Revenue $0 to ($416,667) $0 to ($500,000) $0 to ($500,000)
Total Estimated

Net Effect on All

State Funds

$0 to ( $416,667) $0 to ($500,000) $0 to ($500,000)



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004
None $0 $0 $0
Total Estimated

Net Effect on All

Federal Funds

$0 $0 $0



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004
Local Government $0 $0 $0

Numbers within parentheses: ( ) indicate costs or losses.

This fiscal note contains 3 pages.



FISCAL ANALYSIS



ASSUMPTION



Officials from the Coordinating Board for Higher Education assumed the proposed legislation would have no fiscal impact on their agency.



Officials from the Department of Agriculture (AGR) assume there will be no fiscal impact from this proposal.



Officials from the Department of Economic Development (DED) assume that while there would be minimal costs for travel, no fiscal impact is expected from this legislation. The proposal will have no impact on the DED other than the Director would have to coordinate and collaborate with the agri-market development center and also serve on the advisory board.



Officials from the University of Missouri (UM) originally assumed the UM would incur costs of approximately $500,000 annually to staff, operate and maintain the Center of Interstate Agri-Market Development Center at the University of Missouri-Columbia (Center). In later discussions with officials from UM, they stated there would be no fiscal impact, since the Center would not be set up unless grant funding was received from USDA-RD. UM is submitting a grant request for a single national award of $5,000,000 from USDA-RD to establish the Center. UM will take the lead on this submission with cooperation from the University of Minnesota and Texas A&M. As a part of the submission, a 100% match is required, but officials from UM are uncertain what the match requirements are at this time.



Oversight assumes that since the bill states that the director of the Center shall be a state employee, there will be some fiscal impact if the Center is established. In addition, there could be other unknown costs associated with this project. Total costs to the state are indeterminable at this time, therefore, Oversight has reflected a range of costs from $0 to $500,000 annually.





FISCAL IMPACT - State Government

GENERAL REVENUE FUND

FY 2002

(10 Mo.)

FY 2003 FY 2004
Costs - University of Missouri
Staff, Operations, Maintenance $0 to ($416,667) $0 to ($500,000) $0 to ($500,000)
Estimated Net Effect on General
Revenue Fund $0 to ($416,667) $0 to ($500,000) $0 to ($500,000)





FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government FY 2002

(10 Mo.)

FY 2003 FY 2004
$0 $0 $0



FISCAL IMPACT - Small Business



Small business could be affected by the provisions of this proposal.



DESCRIPTION



This proposal would create the Interstate Agri-market Development Center which will be under the direction and control of the Curators of the University of Missouri and will be centered on the Columbia campus. The Director of the Center will be appointed by the President of the University and approved by the Curators. An advisory board is created to provide direction

and oversight to the Center. It will have 11 members with staggered four year terms. The Director is given authority to cooperate and collaborate with other entities and agencies to carry out the functions of the Center. The Center will acquire, archive, process and disseminate information to producers through the Internet. The provisions of the proposal shall terminate on August 28, 2002, should the interstate agri-market development center not receive federal matching funds.



This legislation is not federally mandated and would not require additional capital improvements or rental space. Officials from the AGR noted that this proposal does not directly duplicate another program, however, it may overlap current responsibilities of the department's Ag Innovation Center and the Market Development Division. In addition, officials from the DED noted that this proposal would appear to duplicate some existing duties of the department's Office of International Marketing.



SOURCES OF INFORMATION



Coordinating Board for Higher Education

Department of Agriculture

Department of Economic Development

University of Missouri





Jeanne Jarrett, CPA

Director



March 20, 2001