COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH

OVERSIGHT DIVISION



FISCAL NOTE



L.R. No.: 0974-01

Bill No.: SB 0360

Subject: Courts; Judges; Civil Procedure; Revenue Dept.

Type: Original

Date: February 8, 2001




FISCAL SUMMARY



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON STATE FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004
Total Estimated

Net Effect on All

State Funds

$0 $0 $0



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004
Total Estimated

Net Effect on All

Federal Funds

$0 $0 $0



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004
Local Government $0 $0 $0

Numbers within parentheses: ( ) indicate costs or losses.

This fiscal note contains 3 pages.





FISCAL ANALYSIS



ASSUMPTIONS



Officials from the Department of Transportation, Office of Prosecution Services, Office of State Courts Administrator, and Office of the State Public Defender assume this proposal would have no fiscal impact on their organization.



Officials from the Department of Revenue assume:



The impact of this legislation will eliminate the use of traffic commissioners from hearing Department of Revenue administrative driving while intoxicated trial denovo cases St. Louis County. While this will not increase case loads for the department's staff attorney's, this may require the department to have additional staff attorneys to cover dockets that are spread among a much broader number of associate circuit court judges in St. Louis County.



This legislation will potentially create longer trials and more judicial decisions rendered in error. These affects are a result of spreading driving while intoxicated appeal cases among a much larger group of judges who are not aware of the complexity and ever changing requirements in Missouri's driving while intoxicated laws.



The Department of Revenue's General Counsel's Office will have significant impact in sustaining appropriate attorney staff levels that will be required to cover a much broader docket schedule in St. Louis County.



The fiscal impact is unknown.



Oversight assumes the fiscal impact, if any, will be minimal and can be met with existing resources.



FISCAL IMPACT - State Government FY 2002

(10 Mo.)

FY 2003 FY 2004
$0 $0 $0



FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government FY 2002

(10 Mo.)

FY 2003 FY 2004
$0 $0 $0



FISCAL IMPACT - Small Business



No direct fiscal impact to small businesses would be expected as a result of this proposal.



DESCRIPTION



This proposal would prevent traffic court judges from reviewing Dept. of Revenue decisions.



This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not require additional capital improvements or rental space.



SOURCES OF INFORMATION



Department of Transportation

Office of Prosecution Services

Office of the State Public Defender

Department of Revenue



NOT RESPONDING



Office of the Attorney General





Jeanne Jarrett, CPA

Director

February 8, 2001