COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH

OVERSIGHT DIVISION



FISCAL NOTE



L.R. No.: 0922-04

Bill No.: SB 238

Subject: Taxation and Revenue, Tourism

Type: Original

Date: January 29, 2001




FISCAL SUMMARY



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON STATE FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004
Division of Tourism Supplemental Revenue Fund $0 $0 $0
General Revenue $0 ($2,322,430) ($4,067,850)
Total Estimated

Net Effect on All

State Funds

$0 ($2,322,430) ($4,067,850)



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004
None
Total Estimated

Net Effect on All

Federal Funds

$0 $0 $0



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004
Local Government $0 $0 $0

Numbers within parentheses: ( ) indicate costs or losses.

This fiscal note contains 4 pages.

FISCAL ANALYSIS



ASSUMPTION



Officials from the Department of Economic Development - Division of Tourism (DED) state that this proposal will allow for additional funding to their agency to better promote Missouri's tourism industry to the traveling public. The DED assumes this proposal contains four major changes to the formula used to determine additional funding to the Division of Tourism;

The Division of Tourism assumes this will result in an increase in funding from the General Revenue fund to the Tourism Supplemental Revenue fund of $2,322,430 in FY 2003 and $4,067,850 in FY 2004. The DED also assumes these extra amounts transferred to their division will be spent on tourism advertising, and therefore will result in a total decrease in state funds in FY 2003 and FY 2004 by those amounts. DED also assumes the increased tourism advertising and promotion from these funds will result in an unknown additional tourism related tax revenue for both the state and the local governments.



Officials from the Department of Revenue and the Office of Administration assume that the proposal would have no administrative impact to their respective agencies.



Officials from the Office of the State Treasurer state that they defer to the response from the Department of Economic Development - Division of Tourism.



Oversight assumes the Division of Tourism will spend all of the additional funds that are transferred to the Tourism Supplement Revenue Fund on advertising for the state, and therefore show a zero net effect to that fund, but an overall cost to the state by the amounts transferred out of the General Revenue fund. Oversight also assumes the increased tax revenue for both the state and local governments may be beyond the scope of this fiscal note, and have therefore, not included the possible additional tax revenue.





FISCAL IMPACT - State Government FY 2002

(10 Mo.)

FY 2003 FY 2004
GENERAL REVENUE
Transfer Out - to Tourism Supplemental $0 ($2,322,430) ($4,067,850)
Revenue fund



DIVISION OF TOURISM SUPPLEMENTAL REVENUE FUND
Transfer In - from General Revenue $0 $2,322,430 $4,067,850
Costs - additional advertising and
promotion for Missouri tourism $0 ($2,322,430) ($4,067,850)
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON DIVISION OF TOURISM SUPPLEMENTAL REVENUE FUND

$0


$0


$0


FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government FY 2002

(10 Mo.)

FY 2003 FY 2004
$0 $0 $0



FISCAL IMPACT - Small Business



This proposal will provide the Division of Tourism additional funds to promote tourist destinations, attractions and events, resulting in more business and having a positive impact on tourism businesses, including small businesses, in the state of Missouri.



DESCRIPTION



This proposal would revise the Tourism Supplemental Revenue Fund. Three changes are made to the fund: 1) The inflation component is reduced to two percent; 2) The cap is changed from $3 million to an increasing cap of the previous year's maximum plus any percentage of positive growth in retail sale of tourism-oriented goods and services in the fiscal year three years prior to

the fiscal year in which the transfer is made; and 3) The SIC code for "Botanical & Zoological Gardens" has been replaced with the SIC code for "Automobile Rentals Without Drivers."



This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not require additional capital improvements or rental space.





SOURCES OF INFORMATION



Department of Economic Development

Division of Tourism

Department of Revenue

Office of the State Treasurer

Office of Administration









Jeanne Jarrett, CPA

Director

January 29, 2001