COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH

OVERSIGHT DIVISION



FISCAL NOTE



L.R. No.: 0370-01

Bill No.: SB 15

Subject: Department of Natural Resources; Clean Water Commission

Type: Original

Date: January 22, 2001




FISCAL SUMMARY



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON STATE FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004
None $0 $0 $0
Total Estimated

Net Effect on All

State Funds

$0 $0 $0



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004
None $0 $0 $0
Total Estimated

Net Effect on All

Federal Funds

$0 $0 $0



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004
Local Government $0 $0 $0

Numbers within parentheses: ( ) indicate costs or losses.

This fiscal note contains 3 pages.

FISCAL ANALYSIS



ASSUMPTION



Officials from the City of Sikeston assume the proposed legislation would have no fiscal impact on their city.



Officials from the Department of Natural Resources assume the proposed bill would have no fiscal impact, provided that the removal of income limitations for certain members does not result in compliance issues with Federal Clean Water requirements.





FISCAL IMPACT - State Government FY 2002

(10 Mo.)

FY 2003 FY 2004
$0 $0 $0





FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government FY 2002

(10 Mo.)

FY 2003 FY 2004
$0 $0 $0





FISCAL IMPACT - Small Business



No direct fiscal impact to small businesses would be expected as a result of this proposal.





DESCRIPTION



This proposal would revise the selection criteria for the Clean Water Commission. The Commission currently consists of six members and must have exactly two members who are knowledgeable concerning the needs of agriculture, industry or mining and interested in protecting these needs in a manner consistent with state law. This proposal requires that the Commission also include two members knowledgeable of and associated with publicly-owned wastewater treatment works. One of these members shall be associated with a wastewater treatment works serving fewer than 50,000 persons and one with a wastewater treatment works serving at least 50,000 persons. In additional, two members shall represent the public. The proposal also requires that all new members appointed on or after the effective date of this act shall have demonstrated an interest and knowledge about water quality and shall be qualified to DESCRIPTION (continued)



provide, assess and evaluate scientific and technical information about water quality, financial requirements and the effects of the promulgation of standards, rules and regulations.

This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not require additional capital improvements or rental space.





SOURCES OF INFORMATION



City of Sikeston

Department of Natural Resources



THE FOLLOWING CITIES DID NOT RESPOND: JEFFERSON, JOPLIN, COLUMBIA, ST. CHARLES AND SPRINGFIELD











Jeanne Jarrett, CPA

Director

January 22, 2001