COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH

OVERSIGHT DIVISION



FISCAL NOTE



L.R. No.: 0356-01

Bill No.: SB 36

Subject: Alcohol; Crimes and Punishment; Probation and Parole; Licenses - Motor Vehicles; Motor Vehicles; Revenue Department; Drunk Driving/Boating; Evidence

Type: Original

Date: January 12, 2001




FISCAL SUMMARY



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON STATE FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004
Highway Funds ($34,293) to ($84,293) $42,977 $55,438
Total Estimated

Net Effect on All

State Funds

($34,293) to ($84,293) $42,977 $55,438



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004
Total Estimated

Net Effect on All

Federal Funds

$0 $0 $0



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004
Cities $8,460 $24,961 $27,864
Counties $5,621 $16,641 $18,576
Local Government $14,051 $41,602 $46,440

Numbers within parentheses: ( ) indicate costs or losses.

This fiscal note contains 10 pages.







FISCAL ANALYSIS



ASSUMPTIONS



In response to previous versions of this proposal, officials of the Department of Public Safety - Missouri State Highway Patrol and Office of Prosecution Services assume this proposal would have no fiscal impact to their agencies.



In response to previous versions of this proposal, officials of the Office of the Attorney General assumed this proposal would have no fiscal impact to their agency.



In response to previous versions of this proposal, officials of the State Public Defender (SPD) assume that existing staff could provide representation for those 50 - 75 cases arising where indigent persons were charged with "driving while intoxicated at .08%." However, passage of more than one similar bill would require the State Public Defender System to request increased appropriations to cover the cumulative cost of representing the indigent accused.



Officials of the Office of State Courts Administrator (CTS) assume there will be an increased caseload as a result of this proposal. However, they have no way of quantifying the increase at this time. In a response to a similar proposal in the prior session (SB 782, 2000) CTS said they would not expect a significant impact on the budget of the judiciary.



Officials from the Department of Corrections (DOC), in a response to a similar proposal in the prior session (SB 782, 2000) assumed the impact of that proposal would be minimal and could be absorbed with existing resources.



Officials from the Department of Health assume no impact to the agency.



Officials of the Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT) stated that this proposal would have no direct fiscal impact on their agency. However, they advise that according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, a state must pass several new statutory provisions in order to remain eligible for full federal highway funding.



A. .08 BAC. - Congress, in the recently enacted FY 2001 U.S. Dept of Transportation Appropriations bill, requires states to enact and enforce by October 1, 2003, a .08 BAC law. States that do not comply will have 2 percent of their National Highway System (NHS), Surface Transportation Program (STP) and Interstate Maintenance (IM) funds withheld from their apportionment for that federal fiscal year.











ASSUMPTIONS - continued

B. In the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA 21) Restoration Act, Congress requires states to adopt laws that would prohibit the possession of open alcoholic beverage containers. If a state fails to pass a conforming open container law by October 1, 2000, a state must transfer 1 and ½ percent of its NHS, STP and IM funds.



C. In the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA 21) Restoration Act, Congress

requires states to adopt laws that would increase the penalties for repeat offenders of intoxication-related offenses. If a state fails to pass a conforming repeat offender law by October 1, 2000, a state must transfer 1 and ½ percent of its NHS, STP and IM funds.



Fiscal impact of not enacting .08 BAC Mandate:



October 1, 2003 - 2.0 percent of Interstate Maintenance, National Highway System and Surface Transportation funds will be withheld from the State's apportionment =

$8.1 million.



Fiscal impact of not enacting Repeat Offender Mandate:



October 1, 2001 - 1.5 percent of Interstate Maintenance, National Highway System and Surface Transportation funds will be transferred to the Section 402 Safety Program =

$6.2 million.



October 1, 2002 - 3.0 percent of Interstate Maintenance, National Highway System and Surface Transportation funds will be transferred to the Section 402 Safety Program = $12.8 million.



October 1, 2003 - 3.0 percent of Interstate Maintenance, National Highway System and Surface Transportation funds will be transferred to the Section 402 Safety Program = $13.1 million.



Because these financial penalties are prospective and would result from the failure of the state of Missouri to act timely, Oversight has excluded these amounts from the fiscal impact.



The current ignition interlock device program only prohibits operation of a motor vehicle that is not equipped with an ignition interlock device. This proposal requires that individuals under court order to install ignition interlock devices cannot operate or own a motor vehicle that is not equipped with an ignition interlock device.









ASSUMPTIONS - continued



The Department of Revenue will be required to edit applications for motor vehicle titles to ensure the applicant does not have an ignition interlock requirement. In order to accomplish this, programming will be necessary to the Field Audit System for Titling and Registration (FASTR). This system will require an interface to the Missouri Drivers License System (MODL) in order to determine the ignition interlock requirement of each person titling a motor vehicle. Although the Driver and Vehicle Services Bureau anticipates this to have minimal impact to processing title and registration applications, the cost of programming the FASTR system is unknown. The Driver and Vehicle Services Bureau anticipates that the costs for such programming will not exceed $50,000.



Oversight has ranged the programming costs from$0 to $50,000 in FY 2002 depending on whether DOR must make programming changes to the FASTR system to track the issuance of ignition interlock devices on the vehicle registration statements.



The Driver and Vehicle Services Bureau assumes that in the short term (3 to 5 years), this legislation will increase the number of administrative alcohol arrests pursuant to section 302.500 RSMo, by 16.7%. The Driver and Vehicle Services Bureau also assumes the same increase (16.7%) on alcohol related convictions.



These increases will result in the following increased workloads in the Driver and Vehicle Services Bureau:



Work Process Volume of Increase



Administrative Alcohol Arrest Documentation = 3,826

Alcohol Related Convictions = 2,406

Notices of Suspension/Revocation = 6,232

Reinstatement Notices = 4,241

Correspondence Inquiries = 1,122



Total Increased Documentation for Processing: 17,827



In order to process this increased documentation the Driver and Vehicle Services Bureau will require one additional FTE (clerk typist II). The requested Clerk Typist II position will be responsible for responding to correspondence inquiries, entering arrest and conviction data, reinstatement fees, proof of insurance (required for reinstatement), and alcohol education completion certificates into automated computer systems. Oversight assumes the additional clerk typist duties could be absorbed with existing resources.







ASSUMPTIONS - continued

POSTAGE



The Driver and Vehicle Services Bureau will require additional postage funding as a result of an estimated 11,595 documents required to be mailed. This documentation includes notices of suspension/revocation, notices of reinstatement, and responses to correspondence inquiries.



Additional postage funding will also be required in order to facilitate the reprinting of Alcohol Influence Reports (form DOR-2389) and the Notice of Suspension/Revocation (form DOR-2385) which is given to the offender at the time of arrest.



The Driver and Vehicle Services Bureau will distribute 100,000 of each of these forms to law enforcement agencies throughout the state. Postage for this distribution of forms is estimated to be $3,100.



Oversight assumes DOR could absorb the cost of postage for the flyers, and has excluded such costs from the fiscal impact.



FORMS



The Driver and Vehicle Services Bureau will be required to modify two forms in order to identify the appropriate reduction in the blood alcohol content threshold and the increased penalties for driving while intoxicated. This will require reprinting of Alcohol Influence Reports (form DOR-2389) and the Notice of Suspension/Revocation (form DOR-2385) which is given to the offender at the time of arrest.



The Driver and Vehicle Services Bureau will distribute 100,000 of each of these forms to law enforcement agencies throughout the state. Costs for reprinting these forms are estimated to be $6,000.



Oversight assumes DOR could absorb the cost of production of the forms, and has excluded such costs from the fiscal impact.



REVENUE INCREASE



Additional suspension and revocation actions will be imposed as a result of lower blood alcohol content threshold.



The Driver and Vehicle Services Bureau estimates 4,241 additional reinstatements annually. This estimate is based on statistics obtained from the Missouri Drivers License (MODL) System.





ASSUMPTIONS - continued



Fiscal Year 2002 estimates are based on only three months calculations for administrative alcohol and point accumulation suspensions. This is due to the requirement of a one month notice prior to enforcement of the suspension, a two month suspension period, and a four month period of restricted driving prior to reinstatement. In addition, the effective date of this legislation is assumed to be August 28, 2001 which reduces the total months in the fiscal year to ten months.



Administrative alcohol license revocations are also not calculated in fiscal year 2002 or 2003 as these actions are two year sanctions. The first administrative alcohol revocations will not be eligible for reinstatement until August 28, 2003 under this assumption (FY 2004).

FY 02



2,094 Administrative Alcohol Suspensions

1,171 Point Accumulation Suspensions

3,265 Total Suspension Reinstatements



3,265 Total Suspension Reinstatements

/ 12 Months per Year

272 Suspension Reinstatements per Month

x 3 Months of Eligible Reinstatement for Suspensions

816 Total Suspension Reinstatements for FY02

+ 433 Point Accumulation Revocations Reinstatements

1,249 Additional Reinstatements for FY02

x $45 Reinstatement Fee

$56,205 Total Increased Reinstatement Fee Collection FY02



FY 03



3,265 Total Suspension Reinstatements

+ 433 Total Point Revocation Reinstatements

3,698 Total Reinstatements for FY03

x $45 Reinstatement Fee

$166,410 Total Increased Reinstatement Fee Collection for FY03















ASSUMPTIONS - continued



FY 04



514 Total Administrative Alcohol Revocations Reinstatements Annually

/ 12 Months per Year

43 Administrative Alcohol Revocations Reinstatements per Month

x 10 Number of Months Administrative Revocations are Eligible for Reinstatement

430 Total Administrative Revocation Reinstatements for FY 04

3,265 Total Suspension Reinstatements

+ 433 Total Point Revocation Reinstatements

4,128 Total Reinstatements for FY04

x $45 Reinstatement Fee

$185,760 Total Increased Reinstatement Fee Collection for FY04



FEE DISTRIBUTION



FY 02



$42,152 Highway Fund

$8,430 Cities

$5,621 Counties



FY 03



$124,808 Highway Fund

$24,961 Cities

$16,641 Counties



FY 04



$139,320 Highway Fund

$27,864 Cities

$18,576 Counties

















ASSUMPTIONS - continued



DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATION (DOR)

General Counsel's Office



The General Counsel's Office assumes the same impact as the Driver and Vehicle Services Bureau (16.7% increase in arrests). The General Counsel's Office expects an increase in the number of hearings requested as a result in the lower blood alcohol threshold. The immediate impact is expected to more significant as more individuals will challenge the legitimacy of lower alcohol threshold and whether or not an individual is impaired at the lower limit. This will require three additional Legal Counsels and one Clerk Typist III in order to process the additional administrative hearings that are associated with the increased number of arrests.



This FTE request is based on current administrative hearing volumes statewide. Nearly half of all hearings are held in the metropolitan areas of Kansas City and St. Louis. One additional Legal Counsel will be needed in each of these areas to absorb the additional hearings that will be requested. The remaining Legal counsel will be used out of the Jefferson City office and will be required to travel to many regions of the state to absorb additional hearing volumes statewide.



The requested Clerk Typist III will be responsible for docketing hearings, scheduling hearings, and preparing hearing documentation.



Oversight assumes that one General Counsel and one Clerk Typist II could handle the additional workload, consistent with DOR's response to a similar proposal in the prior session. The costs to DOR have been adjusted accordingly.





FISCAL IMPACT - State Government FY 2002

(10 Mo.)

FY 2003 FY 2004
HIGHWAY FUNDS
Income - Department of Revenue
Reinstatement fees $42,152 $124,808 $139,320
Cost - Department of Revenue `
Personal Service ($49,250) ($60,578) ($62,092)
Fringe Benefits ($16,415) ($20,190) ($20,695)
Expense and Equipment ($10,780) ($1,063) ($1,095)
Computer programming 0 to ($50,000) $0 $0
Total cost ($76,445) to ($126,445) ($81,831) ($83,882)
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON HIGHWAY FUNDS ($34,293) to ($84,293) $42,977 $55,438



FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government FY 2002

(10 Mo.)

FY 2003 FY 2004
Cities $8,430 $24,961 $27,864
Counties $5,621 $16,641 $18,576
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT $14,051 $41,602 $46,440



FISCAL IMPACT - Small Business



No direct fiscal impact to small businesses would be expected as a result of this proposal.















DESCRIPTION



This bill would lower Missouri's current excessive BAC standard from .10 to .08, change Missouri's anti-consumption law to an anti-possession law as regards to operation of a motor vehicle and would increase jail times and require either impoundment of a motor vehicle or installation of an ignition interlock device on motor vehicles of repeat offenders.



This legislation is federally mandated; however, it would not duplicate any other program and would not require additional capital improvements or rental space.



SOURCES OF INFORMATION



Department of Corrections

Department of Health

Department of Transportation

Department of Public Safety - Missouri Highway Patrol

Department of Revenue

State Courts Administrator

Office of Prosecution Services

State Public Defender

Attorney General





Jeanne Jarrett, CPA

Director

January 12, 2001