COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH

OVERSIGHT DIVISION



FISCAL NOTE



L.R. NO.: 4463-01

BILL NO.: Perfected SB 1002

SUBJECT: Courts; Revision Bills

TYPE: Original

DATE: March 15, 2000




FISCAL SUMMARY



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON STATE FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003
Total Estimated

Net Effect on All

State Funds

$0 $0 $0



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003
Total Estimated

Net Effect on All

Federal Funds

$0 $0 $0



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003
Local Government $0 $0 $0

Numbers within parentheses: ( ) indicate costs or losses.

This fiscal note contains 3 pages.

FISCAL ANALYSIS



ASSUMPTION



Officials from the Office of State Courts Administrator, Sheriff Retirement System, Office of the State Treasurer, Office of Administration, Department of Transportation, Department of Health, Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, Department of Insurance, Department of Labor and Industrial Relations, Office of the State Auditor, Department of Agriculture, Department of Mental Health, Department of Conservation, and State Tax Commission assume the proposed legislation would have no fiscal impact on their agencies.



In a response to similar proposed legislation, officials from the Office of the Attorney General, Department of Revenue, State Public Defender, Office of Prosecution Services, Department of Social Services, Office of Administration - Budget and Planning, Department of Natural Resources, Department of Public Safety, Office of the Secretary of State, Department of Economic Development, and Gaming Commission assumed the proposal would have no fiscal impact on their agencies.



FISCAL IMPACT - State Government FY 2001

(10 Mo.)

FY 2002 FY 2003
$0 $0 $0



FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government FY 2001

(10 Mo.)

FY 2002 FY 2003
$0 $0 $0

FISCAL IMPACT - Small Business



No direct fiscal impact to small businesses would be expected as a result of this proposal.



DESCRIPTION



The proposed legislation recodifies various sections governing court costs, fees, charges, and surcharges into one section of the revised statutes. This revision was mandated by Senate Bill 869 of the Second Regular Session of the 88th General Assembly, 1996.



This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not require additional capital improvements or rental space.



SOURCES OF INFORMATION



Office of the State Courts Administrator

Sheriff Retirement System

Office of the State Treasurer

Office of Administration

Department of Transportation

Department of Health

Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Department of Insurance

Department of Labor and Industrial Relations

Office of the State Auditor

Department of Agriculture

Department of Mental Health

Department of Conservation

State Tax Commission

Office of the Attorney General

Department of Revenue

State Public Defender

Office of Prosecution Services

Department of Social Services

Office of Administration - Budget and Planning

Department of Natural Resources

Department of Public Safety

Office of the Secretary of State

Department of Economic Development

Gaming Commission



NOT RESPONDING: Coordinating Board of Higher Education, Department of Corrections, Missouri Lottery Commission, St. Louis County Circuit Clerk, St. Louis City Circuit Clerk, Kansas City Circuit Clerk, Jackson County Circuit Clerk, Cole County Circuit Clerk, Boone County Circuit Clerk, Greene County Circuit Clerk, Marion County Circuit Clerk, St. Louis County Prosecuting Attorney, St. Louis City Prosecuting Attorney, Kansas City Prosecuting Attorney, Jackson County Prosecuting Attorney, Cole County Prosecuting Attorney, Boone County Prosecuting Attorney, Greene County Prosecuting Attorney, and Marion County Prosecuting Attorney



Jeanne Jarrett, CPA

Director

March 15, 2000