COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH

OVERSIGHT DIVISION



FISCAL NOTE



L.R. NO.: 4227-01

BILL NO.: SB 909

SUBJECT: Cities, Towns and Villages; Counties; Political Subdivisions; Taxation and Revenue - Income; Taxation and Revenue - Sales and Use.

TYPE: Original

DATE: February 16, 2000




FISCAL SUMMARY



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON STATE FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003
General Revenue ($481,800) $596,513 $890,669
Local Revenue Replacement Fund $0 $0 $0
Total Estimated

Net Effect on All

State Funds*

($481,800) $596,513 $890,669



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003
Total Estimated

Net Effect on All

Federal Funds

$0 $0 $0



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003
Local Government* $0 ($20,383,700) ($15,694,800)

* This proposal is permissive. Voter approval would be required before fiscal impact would be realized.

Numbers within parentheses: ( ) indicate costs or losses

This fiscal note contains 6 pages.

FISCAL ANALYSIS



ASSUMPTION



Officials from the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) state under this proposal, the following issues would be put to a vote of the people in November, 2000:



(1) Limit the amount of federal income taxes paid which may be taken as a deduction for purposes of computing Missouri state income tax liability. This will increase income tax liabilities for some Missouri taxpayers;



(2) Exempt sales of food from local option sales tax;



(3) Create the "Local Revenue Replacement Fund". Additional revenue attributable to the limitation on federal deductibility is to be deposited into the Local Revenue Replacement Fund, less 2% for administration purposes. Revenues lost by local political subdivisions from the exemption on food sales are to be replaced by revenues from the Local Revenue Replacement Fund.



The DESE assumes this proposal will have no fiscal impact on their agency.



Officials from the Department of Revenue (DOR) state this proposal eliminates the local sales tax on food and replaces the lost revenue to political subdivisions by limiting the Federal Income Tax (FIT) deduction for individuals to $3,300 for a single return and $6,600 for a combined return. The DOR states this proposal does not deal with how the loss in sales tax to political subdivisions would actually be distributed. The DOR assumed they would be responsible for computing this loss for each political subdivision and using funds collected from this reduced federal tax deduction to replace and subsequently disburse these funds.



The DOR states that to reduce the federal tax deduction on the Missouri return will require major changes in the MINITS system (individual system). The DOR forecasts 952 hours @ $22.00 per hour to accomplish. The MITS system (sales tax system) will also require changes to eliminate the food sales tax, and to build a distribution data base that computes and sends checks to 800 or so political subdivisions to replace the food sales tax. To build this distribution system and make other modifications, the DOR forecasts 4,541 programming hours at $23.00 per hour plus roughly $35,700 in additional data storage costs. In addition, the DOR will require 1 Tax Processing Technician to handle correspondence from cities and counties and administer the distribution system, and 3 additional Tax Processing Technicians to deal with additional errors and correspondence (around 120,000) that the DOR will incur from reducing the federal income tax deduction.





ASSUMPTION (continued)



Oversight assumes the DOR will require the three Tax Processing Technicians starting in FY 2002 and that additional floor space will not be necessary. Oversight also assumes the

programming changes would be started and completed in FY 2002.



In a similar proposal from this year, officials from the Office of Administration, Budget and Planning estimated the revenue impact of both the food exemption from sales tax and the increased income tax revenue from the decrease in federal income tax deduction. The reduction in sales tax revenue is estimated to be $0 in FY 2001, $124.43 million in FY 2002, and $126.92 million in FY 2003, based on an average local sales tax rate of 1.5 percent. The increase in income tax revenue from the decreased federal income tax deduction is estimated to increase revenue to the state by $0 in FY 2001, $104.9 in FY 2002, and $112.2 million in FY 2003.



Oversight assumes, pending voter approval in November, 2000, the effective date of the sales tax exemption for food on local sales taxes will be July 1, 2001 (FY 2002). The corresponding effective date of the decrease in federal income tax deduction would occur for all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2001, which would be realized by the state on returns filed starting January 1, 2002 (FY 2002).



Officials from the Department of Higher Educations state this proposal will not fiscally impact their agency, but did state that this proposal may trigger additional Hancock Amendment refunds as a result of the increased income tax revenue.



The State Treasurer's Office and the State Tax Commission assume this legislation will not fiscally impact their agencies.



In a similar proposal from this year, The Secretary of State's Office stated advertisement costs for the proposal would be $4,380 per newspaper column inch for three publications of the text of the proposal, the introduction, title, fiscal note summary, and affidavit. The proposal would be on the ballot for the November 2000 general election.



FISCAL IMPACT - State Government FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003

(10 Mo.)



GENERAL REVENUE FUND



Costs - Secretary of State

Newspaper Advertisements ($481,800) $0 $0





FISCAL IMPACT - State Government FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003

(continued) (10 Mo.)



Costs - Department of Revenue

Personal Service (3 FTE) $0 ($62,029) ($63,580)

Fringe Benefits $0 ($19,074) ($19,551)

Expense and equipment $0 ($11,220) ($1,000)

Programming changes $0 ($164,864) $0

Total Costs - DOR $0 ($257,187) ($84,131)



Loss - General Revenue Fund

Loss of 1% collection fee on sales $0 ($1,244,300) ($1,269,200)

tax revenue on food.



Revenue - General Revenue Fund

Revenue from decreased FIT deduction. $0 $104,900,000 $112,200,000



Cost - General Revenue Fund

Transfer to Local Revenue Replacement Fund $0 ($102,802,000) ($109,956,000)

(revenue less a 2% administration fee)



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON ($481,800) $596,513 $890,669

GENERAL REVENUE FUND

-SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATION-



LOCAL REVENUE REPLACEMENT FUND



Income - Transfers from the General $0 $102,802,000 $109,956,000

Revenue Fund



Costs - Distributions to the Local

Political Subdivisions $0 ($102,802,000) ($109,956,000)



NET EFFECT ON LOCAL REVENUE

REPLACEMENT FUND $0 $0 $0



-SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATION-





FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003

(10 Mo.)

POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS



Costs - Lost Revenue from

sales tax exemption on food $0 ($123,185,700) ($125,650,800)



Income - Distributions from the Local

Revenue Replacement Fund $0 $102,802,000 $109,956,000



NET EFFECT ON POLITICAL

SUBDIVISIONS $0 ($20,383,700) ($15,694,800)





FISCAL IMPACT - Small Business



Small businesses who sell certain foods would be expected to be fiscally impacted to the extent that they would no longer collect and pay sales tax on these items. Small businesses who would purchase food would pay less for such items.





DESCRIPTION



This act exempts retail sales of food as defined in Section 144.014, RSMo, from local sales tax and offsets lost revenue with funds generated by reduction in size of federal income tax deduction, subject to referendum.





This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not require additional capital improvements or rental space.























SOURCES OF INFORMATION



Department of Revenue

Office of Administration

Budget and Planning

State Treasurer's Office

State Tax Commission

Department of Higher Education

Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Office of the Secretary of State















Jeanne Jarrett, CPA

Director

February 16, 2000