COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH

OVERSIGHT DIVISION



FISCAL NOTE



L.R. NO.: 3480-06

BILL NO.: SCS for SB 826

SUBJECT: Motor vehicle, Franchise Law

TYPE: Original

DATE: March 3, 2000




FISCAL SUMMARY



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON STATE FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003
None $0 $0 $0
Total Estimated

Net Effect on All

State Funds

$0 $0 $0



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003
None $0 $0 $0
Total Estimated

Net Effect on All

Federal Funds

$0 $0 $0



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003
Local Government $0 $0 $0

Numbers within parentheses: ( ) indicate costs or losses

This fiscal note contains 4 pages.



FISCAL ANALYSIS



ASSUMPTION



The Office of the State Courts Administrator, Office of the Secretary of State, Department of Economic Development, Office of Administration - Administrative Hearing Commission, Department of Revenue and the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations assume the proposed legislation would have no fiscal impact on their agencies.





FISCAL IMPACT - State Government FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003

(10 Mo.)



$0 $0 $0





FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003

(10 Mo.)



$0 $0 $0





FISCAL IMPACT - Small Business



Small businesses which are motor vehicle dealers or sell motor vehicles would be affected by this proposal.





DESCRIPTION



This substitute makes several changes to the relationship of automobile dealers and manufacturers within the motor vehicle franchise law.

Expands time limits for the process within the Administrative Hearing Commission (AHC). A party seeking relief may file an application for a hearing. The AHC will then enter an order fixing a date, time and place for a hearing on the record to all parties (407.822.1). The act places a hold on any franchisor action requiring "good cause" when the action is protested by a franchisee, and the administrative law judge determines that good cause does not exist. This act allows parties to obtain discovery in the same manner as other civil actions. Appeals are provided for, and jurisdiction is Cole County.



DESCRIPTION (continued)



This substitute also requires that new cases filed to enforce an administrative finding in circuit court be held in abeyance if the underlying judgment is on appeal (407.822.2).



This act establishes protections for a dealer's relevant market area (RMA). RMA is defined as

either a 12 or 20 mile radius depending on whether the population of the county is over or under 300,000. Any dealer can follow an administrative complaint process when the factory wants to establish or move another dealership within his or her area. (407.817) The AHC uses a list of factors to weigh the benefits of the proposed dealership. The AHC must find 7 of the 10 factors in favor of adding a dealership before it can approve.



This act also requires the manufacturer to compensate the dealership parts used in preparation or in warranty defects within 30 days. (407.825.1(17)) Audits by manufacturers for warranty compensation shall not be done more than 12 months after a claim. (407.825.1(18)) This act also clarifies, in section 407.822.4(2), that manufacturers must approve or deny the sale of a

dealership within 60 days.



Manufacturers can only deny reimbursement for warranty work and incentives based on their written guidelines. (407.825.1(19)) Dealers may not be restricted from selling multiple line-makes of cars, and may not be required to be exclusive to selling one brand. This is also known as "dualing" and "exclusivity". (407.825.1(20))



Section 407.923 prohibits, until otherwise prescribed in law, the ownership of a dealership by a manufacturer. Ownership would be currently allowed in two circumstances: temporary holding while the dealership is for sale; and assisting a person who is economically disadvantaged in buying a dealership. This section would also prohibit "factory financing", where a consumer borrows from a subsidiary of the manufacturer.



This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program, and would not require additional capital improvements or rental space.





SOURCES OF INFORMATION



State Courts Administrator

Secretary of State

Department of Economic Development

Office of Administration

Administrative Hearing Commission

Department of Labor and Industrial Relations

Department of Revenue



NOT RESPONDING: Circuit Court of Cole County.



















Jeanne Jarrett, CPA

Director

March 3, 2000