COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH
OVERSIGHT DIVISION
FISCAL NOTE
L.R. NO.: 3169-01
BILL NO.: Perfected SB 816
SUBJECT: Retirement: Teachers
TYPE: Original
DATE: February 23, 2000
FISCAL SUMMARY
| FUND AFFECTED | FY 2001 | FY 2002 | FY 2003 |
| None | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Total Estimated
Net Effect on All State Funds |
$0 | $0 | $0 |
| FUND AFFECTED | FY 2001 | FY 2002 | FY 2003 |
| None | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Total Estimated
Net Effect on All Federal Funds |
$0 | $0 | $0 |
| FUND AFFECTED | FY 2001 | FY 2002 | FY 2003 |
| Local Government | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Numbers within parentheses: ( ) indicate costs or losses.
This fiscal note contains 3 pages.
ASSUMPTION
Officials of the Joint Committee on Public Employee Retirement have reviewed this proposal and have determined that it does not represent a "substantial proposed change" in future plan benefits as defined in section 105.660(5), RSMo. Therefore, an actuarial cost statement is not required.
Officials of the Office of Administration assume any fiscal impact would be determined by the Public School Retirement System.
Public School Retirement System (PSRS) officials assume that the proposal would allow PSRS to continue to pay benefits and collect contributions as currently established in state law. They note that the U.S. Congress set limits on benefits derived from qualified defined benefit plans (such as PSRS) but subsequently passed "Excess Plan" language in section 415(b) of federal tax code to allow for the payment of these benefits. Officials assume the current proposal would not allow any benefit payments beyond those contained in current state law, but would merely allow PSRS to continue to pay benefits as authorized by state law without limitations from the federal government. Therefore, there would be no cost to the system as a result of the proposal.
|
FISCAL IMPACT - State Government |
FY 2001
(10 Mo.) |
FY 2002 | FY 2003 |
| $0 | $0 | $0 |
|
FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government |
FY 2001
(10 Mo.) |
FY 2002 | FY 2003 |
| $0 | $0 | $0 |
FISCAL IMPACT - Small Business
No direct fiscal impact to small businesses would be expected as a result of this proposal.
DESCRIPTION
The proposal would authorize the Public School Retirement System Board of Trustees to establish a benefit plan with benefits in excess of the federal maximum benefit amount established in 26 U.S.C. 415. Such "secondary" plans are authorized in 26 U.S.C. 415(m)(3)(A) and may only be used to provide the benefits in excess of the federal maximum benefit amounts.
This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not require additional capital improvements or rental space.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Joint Committee on Public Employee Retirement
Office of Administration
Public School Retirement System
Jeanne Jarrett, CPA
Director
February 23, 2000