COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH

OVERSIGHT DIVISION



FISCAL NOTE



L.R. NO.: 2553-01

BILL NO.: SB 680

SUBJECT: Courts; Criminal Procedure

TYPE: Original

DATE: January 31, 2000




FISCAL SUMMARY



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON STATE FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003
None
Total Estimated

Net Effect on All

State Funds

$0 $0 $0



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003
None
Total Estimated

Net Effect on All

Federal Funds

$0 $0 $0



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003
Local Government $0 $0 $0


Numbers within parentheses: ( ) indicate costs or losses.

This fiscal note contains 3 pages.



FISCAL ANALYSIS



ASSUMPTION



Officials from the Office of State Courts Administrator (CTS) assume the proposed legislation would impose criminal trial standards of 90 days for incarcerated defendants and 120 days for those out on bail. CTS would not expect any change in the volume of criminal cases as a result of the proposal. After a period of adjustment, judge time could be made available. CTS assumes there may be costs associated with the need for very quick turnaround on various notices, subpoenas and processes. Specifically, CTS assumes there is a chance that the short time frame could result in more requests for jury trials. CTS assumes that the major impact would fall upon prosecutors, public defenders, the private bar and law enforcement. The impact upon the courts would depend upon how the parties implement the proposal. CTS officials assume their agency could request increased funding in future budgetary requests if the proposal resulted in a significant increase in staffing requirements or other increased costs to the judiciary.



Officials from the Department of Public Safety - Missouri State Highway Patrol and Missouri State Water Patrol, the Office of Prosecution Services, the Office of the State Public Defender, the Department of Corrections, and the Office of the Attorney General assume the proposal would have no fiscal impact on their agencies.





FISCAL IMPACT - State Government FY 2001

(10 Mo.)

FY 2002 FY 2003
$0 $0 $0





FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government FY 2001

(10 Mo.)

FY 2002 FY 2003
$0 $0 $0





FISCAL IMPACT - Small Business



No direct fiscal impact to small businesses would be expected as a result of this proposal.







DESCRIPTION



The proposal would amend the time provisions for a speedy trial after indictment. The proposal would repeal current provisions referring to terms of court and replace them with a definite time frame. Under the proposal a person who is held in prison would have to be brought to trial within 90 days after indictment, and a person who is released on bail would have to be tried within 120 days of indictment. If the time frame is exceeded, then the defendant would be entitled to dismissal of the charges, unless the delay is requested by the defendant or is due to lack of time for trial.



This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not require additional capital improvements or rental space.





SOURCES OF INFORMATION



Office of State Courts Administrator

Department of Public Safety - Missouri State Highway Patrol and Missouri State Water Patrol

Office of Prosecution Services

Office of the State Public Defender

Office of the Attorney General

Department of Corrections









Jeanne Jarrett, CPA

Director

January 31, 2000