COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH
OVERSIGHT DIVISION
FISCAL NOTE
L.R. No.: 4793-01
Bill No.: SB 1370
Subject: Energy Conservation
Type: Original
Date: March 5, 2004
FISCAL SUMMARY
| FUND AFFECTED | FY 2004 | FY 2005 | FY 2006 |
| Total Estimated
Net Effect on General Revenue Fund |
$0 | $0 | $0 |
| FUND AFFECTED | FY 2004 | FY 2005 | FY 2006 |
| Total Estimated
Net Effect on Other State Funds |
$0 | $0 | $0 |
Numbers within parentheses: ( ) indicate costs or losses.
This fiscal note contains 4 pages.
| FUND AFFECTED | FY 2004 | FY 2005 | FY 2006 |
| Total Estimated
Net Effect on All Federal Funds |
$0 | $0 | $0 |
| FUND AFFECTED | FY 2004 | FY 2005 | FY 2006 |
| Local Government | $0 | $0 | $0 |
ASSUMPTION
Officials from the Department of Conservation (MDC) assume this proposal would not place any requirements on state agencies beyond what is expected for prudent facilities management. MDC does not foresee any fiscal implications.
Officials of the Office of Administration - Division of Budget and Planning stated that the proposal would have no direct effect on their agency.
Although they did not respond to our request for information, officials from the Office of Administration - Division of Design and Construction stated in response to a similar proposal that the proposal would have no direct effect on their agency.
Officials of the Office of Administration - Division of Facilities Management (DFM) stated that DFM would enter into some energy savings performance contracts that would result in savings. However, the number of such contracts, the facilities involved and the actual savings cannot be determined.
ASSUMPTIONS (continued)
Officials from the Department of Natural Resources and the Department of Transportation stated that the proposal would have no direct effect on their agency.
Officials from the City of Kansas City, the City of St. Louis, St. Louis County, Jackson County, and Greene County did not respond to our request for information.
Oversight notes the proposal would create certain requirements for energy saving and facility improvement contracts. Oversight assumes that neither the state government nor any political subdivision would enter into a contract for energy conservation or facility improvement measures unless it would be to their financial benefit.
| FISCAL IMPACT - State Government | FY 2004
(10 Mo.) |
FY 2005 | FY 2006 |
| $0 | $0 | $0 |
| FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government | FY 2004
(10 Mo.) |
FY 2005 | FY 2006 |
| $0 | $0 | $0 |
FISCAL IMPACT - Small Business
No direct fiscal impact to small businesses would be expected as a result of this proposal.
DESCRIPTION
This proposal would specify certain conditions regarding governmental contracts for energy conservation or facility improvement measures. The proposal contains requirements governmental entities should meet before entering into a measure. It also specifies that governmental entities must solicit bids for contracts and that the contracts be awarded to the most qualified provider that best meets the needs of the entity.
This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not require additional capital improvements or rental space. This proposal would not affect Total State Revenue.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Office of Administration
Division of Budget and Planning
Division of Facilities Management
Department of Conservation
Department of Natural Resources
Department of Transportation
NOT RESPONDING
Office of Administration
Division of Design and Construction
City of Kansas City
City of St. Louis
St. Louis County
Jackson County
Greene County
Mickey Wilson, CPA
Director
March 5, 2004