COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH

OVERSIGHT DIVISION



FISCAL NOTE



L.R. No.: 4371-01

Bill No.: SB 1201

Subject: Business and Commerce; Agriculture Department

Type: Original

Date: February 23, 2004




FISCAL SUMMARY



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON GENERAL REVENUE FUND
FUND AFFECTED FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007
General Fund ($95,575) ($32,374) ($33,184)
Total Estimated

Net Effect on

General Revenue

Fund

($95,575) ($32,374) ($33,184)



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON OTHER STATE FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007
Qualified Fuel Ethanol Producer Incentive Fund Unknown Unknown Unknown
Qualified Biodiesel Incentive Fund Unknown Unknown Unknown
Total Estimated

Net Effect on Other

State Funds

Unknown Unknown Unknown



Numbers within parentheses: ( ) indicate costs or losses.

This fiscal note contains 5 pages.











ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007
Total Estimated

Net Effect on All

Federal Funds

$0 $0 $0



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007
Local Government $0 $0 $0




FISCAL ANALYSIS



ASSUMPTION



Officials with the Department of Agriculture (AGR), Department of Transportation, Department of Natural Resources, Department of Economic Development, and State Treasurer's Office assume this proposal would have no fiscal impact on their agencies.



Officials with the Department of Revenue (DOR) assume this proposal will require to make system changes to business tax system (2,076 programming hours at a cost of $69,255) in FY05. It will also require form changes and process changes to handle the new fee and the new deposit procedures. One Tax Processing Technician would need to be hired to handle the additional duties. DOR assumes that this hire would require additional office space, fixtures, equipment, and expenses totaling $8,608 in FY05. Oversight assumes that the additional hire could utilize existing office resources. Should additional be needed for new equipment or additional expense, DOR could request funding through the appropriation process



Officials from the Office of Secretary of State (SOS) assume this proposal would give AGR, in cooperation with DOR, the authority to adopt rules to implement provisions of this act. These rules would be published in the Missouri Register and the Code of State Regulations. These



ASSUMPTION (continued)



rules could require as many as 24 pages in the Code of State Regulations and half again as many pages in the Missouri Register, as cost statements, fiscal notes, and the like are not repeated in the Code. The estimated cost of a page in the Missouri Register is $23 and the estimated cost of a page in the Code of State Regulations is $27. Based on these costs, the estimated cost of the proposal with respect to rule-making is $1,476 in FY05 and unknown in subsequent years. The actual cost could be more or less than the numbers given. The impact of this legislation in future years is unknown and depends upon the frequency and length of rules filed, amended, rescinded, or withdrawn.



Oversight assumes the SOS could absorb the costs of printing and distributing regulations related to this proposal. If multiple bills pass which would require the printing and distribution of regulations at substantial costs, the SOS could request funding through the appropriation process.



Oversight assumes that until AGR and DOR promulgate rules regarding the dimensions of transport loads and the specific parameters of this surcharge, the amount of revenue that would be generated for the Missouri Qualified Fuel Ethanol Producer Incentive Fund and the Missouri Qualified Biodiesel Incentive Fund is unknown.







FISCAL IMPACT - State Government FY 2005

(10 Mo.)

FY 2006 FY 2007
GENERAL REVENUE
Cost-DOR
Salary/Benefits: Tax Processing Technician I



($26,320)


($32,374)


($33,184)
Systems Programming ($69,255) $0 $0
Total Cost-DOR ($95,575) ($32,374) ($33,184)
NET ESTIMATED EFFECT ON GENERAL FUND

($95,575)


($32,374)


($33,184)






QUALIFIED FUEL ETHANOL PRODUCER INCENTIVE FUND
Revenue-AGR
Petroleum Product Surcharge Unknown Unknown Unknown
NET ESTIMATED EFFECT ON QUALIFIED FUEL ETHANOL PRODUCER INCENTIVE FUND



Unknown




Unknown




Unknown
QUALIFIED BIODIESEL INCENTIVE FUND
Revenue-AGR
Petroleum Product Surcharge Unknown Unknown Unknown
NET ESTIMATED EFFECT ON QUALIFIED BIODIESEL INCENTIVE FUND



Unknown




Unknown




Unknown




FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government FY 2005

(10 Mo.)

FY 2006 FY 2007
$0 $0 $0



FISCAL IMPACT - Small Business



This proposal could impact small businesses by resulting in increased prices in petroleum products for end-users.





DESCRIPTION



This proposal authorizes AGR to assess a surcharge of eighteen dollars per transport load on all petroleum products within state. 55% of the revenue generated is to be credited to the Missouri Qualified Fuel Ethanol Producer Incentive Fund. 45% is to be credited to the Missouri Qualified Biodiesel Incentive Fund. Railroad corporations and airline companies are exempt from the surcharge.





DESCRIPTION (continued)



This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not require additional capital improvements or rental space.



This proposal would increase Total State Revenue.





SOURCES OF INFORMATION



Department of Agriculture

Department of Revenue

Office of Secretary of State

Department of Transportation

Department of Natural Resources

Department of Economic Development

State Treasurer's Office







Mickey Wilson, CPA

Director

February 23, 2004