COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH
OVERSIGHT DIVISION
FISCAL NOTE
L.R. No.: 3961-03
Bill No.: SB 1069
Subject: Public Service Commission; Business and Commerce; Telecommunications
Type: Original
Date: February 2, 2004
FISCAL SUMMARY
FUND AFFECTED | FY 2005 | FY 2006 | FY 2007 |
Total Estimated
Net Effect on General Revenue Fund |
$0 | $0 | $0 |
FUND AFFECTED | FY 2005 | FY 2006 | FY 2007 |
Total Estimated
Net Effect on All State Funds |
$0 | $0 | $0 |
Numbers within parentheses: ( ) indicate costs or losses.
This fiscal note contains 4 pages.
FUND AFFECTED | FY 2005 | FY 2006 | FY 2007 |
Total Estimated
Net Effect on All Federal Funds |
$0 | $0 | $0 |
FUND AFFECTED | FY 2005 | FY 2006 | FY 2007 |
Local Government | $0 | $0 | $0 |
ASSUMPTION
Officials of the Department of Economic Development - Public Service Commission (PSC) state that under the proposed legislation the PSC's authority is reduced to rubber-stamping tariff filings of large incumbent local exchange carriers that would become competitive filings because of the legislation, while competitive carriers serving in the same exchanges would continue to be subject to PCS review under all Sections of 392.200, RSMo. For many tariff filings, the PSC's review time is reduced from thirty days to twenty days. This change could impact PSC resources depending on the level of review necessary for the various types of filings. The services that would be subject to customer-specific pricing would no longer be subject to PSC review.
PSC anticipates no costs due to this proposal.
Officials of the Department of Economic Development - Office of the Public Counsel (OPC) state although this bill has some impact on OPC, OPC should be able to absorb the changes; however, if the requirements of this bill are combined with additional requirements or changes OPC may incur a fiscal impact.
FISCAL IMPACT - State Government | FY 2005
(10 Mo.) |
FY 2006 | FY 2007 |
$0 | $0 | $0 |
FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government | FY 2005
(10 Mo.) |
FY 2006 | FY 2007 |
$0 | $0 | $0 | |
FISCAL IMPACT - Small Business
The proposed legislation outlines several new standards for when services of a large incumbent local exchange telecommunications would be considered competitive. In markets where there is true competition, small businesses could benefit from competitive pricing pressures. In markets where competitive status is obtained through the presence of wireless carriers or prepaid service providers, small business may not benefit from the competitive status. The proposed legislation also provides for customer-specific pricing for business services in those exchanges where the PSC has found effective competition exists under current statutory requirements. Also, the ability to negotiate rates may have an impact on small businesses.
DESCRIPTION
This proposal allows telecommunications companies to file with the Public Service Commission a rate change provided they notify the PSC within twenty days, state the changes proposed, the time such change will go into effect, and by filing new schedules that are to be kept open to public inspection. The PSC may allow a change in rates without requiring the twenty days notice, under good cause and conditions as it may prescribe.
This proposal adds the definition of "central office based broadband service" to Section 386.020, RSMo. This proposal provides the opportunity for regulated, incumbent local exchange telecommunications companies to make up to six annual adjustments to access and local rates.
DESCRIPTION (continued)
This proposal creates a new Section 392.405, that provides for competitive classification of all services in an exchange when the large incumbent company has made a broadband commitment and demonstrates that three or more competitors are providing service within the exchange.
This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not require additional capital improvements or rental space.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Department of Economic Development
Public Service Commission
Office of the Public Counsel
Mickey Wilson, CPA
Director
February 2, 2004