COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH
OVERSIGHT DIVISION
FISCAL NOTE
L.R. No.: 3231-01
Bill No.: SB 856
Subject: Business and Commerce; Employees-Employers; Labor and Management; Workers Compensation; Religion; Evidence; Labor and Industrial Relations Dept.
Type: Original
Date: January 27, 2004
FISCAL SUMMARY
FUND AFFECTED | FY 2005 | FY 2006 | FY 2007 |
General Revenue | (Unknown) to Unknown | (Unknown) to Unknown | (Unknown) to Unknown |
Total Estimated
Net Effect on General Revenue Fund |
(Unknown) to Unknown | (Unknown) to Unknown | (Unknown) to Unknown |
Numbers within parentheses: ( ) indicate costs or losses.
This fiscal note contains 11 pages.
FUND AFFECTED | FY 2005 | FY 2006 | FY 2007 |
Second Injury Fund | $158,836 to $258,836 | $639,531 to $739,531 | $899,131 to $999,131 |
Various State Funds |
(Unknown) to Unknown | (Unknown) to Unknown | (Unknown) to Unknown |
Conservation Commission Fund | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown |
Highway Fund | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown |
Total Estimated
Net Effect on All State Funds |
(Unknown) to Unknown | (Unknown) to Unknown | (Unknown) to Unknown |
FUND AFFECTED | FY 2005 | FY 2006 | FY 2007 |
Total Estimated
Net Effect on All Federal Funds |
$0 | $0 | $0 |
FUND AFFECTED | FY 2005 | FY 2006 | FY 2007 |
Local Government | (Unknown) to Unknown | Unknown) to Unknown | Unknown) to Unknown |
ASSUMPTION
Officials from the Office of Administration, Division of Budget and Planning, and the University of Missouri assume this proposal would have no impact on their organizations.
Officials from the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations, Division of Workers' Compensation (Division) anticipates that the combination of various changes reducing compensable injuries will combine to provide a minimal reduction in benefits, or cost savings, to the Second Injury Fund during the period covered by this fiscal note.
Based on cases disposed of in FY 2001, FY 2002, and FY 2003, the overall average case disposition time equaled 2.91 years for Second Injury Fund cases. These averages ranged from a low of 2.84 years in FY 2003 to a high of 3.00 years in FY 2001.
Since the changes in this proposal will only effect injury dates occurring on, or after, August 28, 2004, it will take several years for the full impact of this proposal to be fully reflected in a cost savings to the Second Injury Fund.
The Division made an assumption that, in its entirety, this legislation will reduce total compensable cases by 3 percent. Based on the last three fiscal years, the average number of Second Injury Fund cases resolved with an award being issued equaled 11,355. A 3 percent reduction in this number equals 11,014. Again, based on Division data, 20.30 percent of all cases are resolved one year from the injury date, an additional 37.70 percent within two years, and another additional 20.35% within three years. Since the onset of each year will initiate different first year cases, second year cases that were once first year cases, and so on, the preceding percentage amount for a given year is added to the current percentage amount, to determine the case resolution numbers. Data from the three preceding years was used to determine the average cost per resolved case.
ASSUMPTION (continued)
The final calculation, with its corresponding cost reduction to the Second Injury Fund is, therefore, as follows:
FY 2005: 11,355 (total average current cases with benefits) X 3% (total % of cases with benefits under new law) = 341 (total projected cases with benefits) X 20.30% (total % projected cases resolved under new law) = 69 (total cases resolved under new law) X $3,743 (average cost per case) = $258,835.75 total cost savings.
FY 2006: 11,355 (total average current cases with benefits) X 3% (total % of cases with benefits under new law) = 341 (total projected cases with benefits) X 58% (total % projected cases resolved under new law) = 198 (total cases resolved under new law) X $3,743 (average cost per case) = $739,530.71 total cost savings.
FY 2007: 11,355 (total average current cases with benefits) X 3% (total % of cases with benefits under new law) = 341 (total projected cases with benefits) X 78.36% (total % projected cases resolved under new law) = 267 (total cases resolved under new law) X $3,743 (average cost per case) = $999,131.49 total cost savings.
Officials from the Office of Administration, Division of Risk Management assume the proposal would generate unknown savings for the General Revenue Fund from the reduction in Workers' Compensation program insurance and costs.
In response to a similar proposal from the prior session, officials from the Department of Public Safety - Missouri State Highway Patrol state their Risk Management section, which is responsible for the administration of the Patrol's Workers' Compensation program, assume this proposal would result in additional unknown cost to their Workers' Compensation system.
In response to a similar proposal from the prior session, officials from the St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department assume costs related to passage of this proposal could be high; however, it would be impossible to calculate the cost of the proposed changes as there is no historical data upon which to base an estimate.
ASSUMPTION (continued)
In response to a similar proposal from the prior session, officials from the City of Columbia Police Department assume there would be costs and losses associated with this proposal and note there would be a significant impact on Workers' Compensation cases.
In response to a similar proposal from the prior session, the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations (DOL) noted there are approximately 20,000 peace officers in Missouri. DOL assumed, based on the limited provisions of the proposal, between zero (0) and two (2) peace officers would have compensable occupational illnesses because of this proposal. DOL assumes if the occupational illness or disease results in Second Injury Fund liability, the annual fiscal impact would be less than $50,000.
Oversight notes even though current law contains a similar provision for peace officers, the language in current law is permissive whereas the language in this proposal is mandatory. Therefore, Oversight is reflecting a fiscal impact related to passage of the proposal. Oversight assumes there would not be enough compensable claims in a given year to cause costs to the Second Injury Fund to be greater than $100,000 and therefore assume costs less than $100,000.
Oversight assumes local governments which are self-insured, could experience increased costs to their Workers' Compensation fund arising from potential increases in out-of-pocket costs and increased contributions to the fund for law enforcement officers.
Oversight assumes there would also be unknown savings to local governments for general employees' Workers' Compensation coverage.
FISCAL IMPACT - State Government | FY 2005
(10 Mo.) |
FY 2006 | FY 2007 |
GENERAL REVENUE | |||
Savings - Office of Administration | |||
Potential Reduction in Claims Paid |
$0 to
Unknown |
$0 to
Unknown |
$0 to
Unknown |
Costs - Office of Administration | |||
Increase in Amounts Paid for Workers'
Compensation Cases (Peace Officers) |
(Unknown, could Exceed $100,000) | (Unknown, could Exceed $100,000) | (Unknown, could Exceed $100,000) |
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON GENERAL REVENUE | (Unknown) to Unknown | (Unknown) to Unknown | (Unknown) to Unknown |
SECOND INJURY FUND | |||
Savings - Division of Workers' Compensation | |||
Reduction in Claims Paid | $258,836 | $739,531 | $999,131 |
Costs - DOL | |||
Increase in Claims Paid (Peace Officers) |
(Less than $100,000) | (Less than $100,000) | (Less than $100,000) |
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON
SECOND INJURY FUND |
$158,836 to $258,836 | $639,531 to $739,531 | $899,131 to $999,131 |
FISCAL IMPACT - State Government | FY 2005
(10 Mo.) |
FY 2006 | FY 2007 |
VARIOUS STATE FUNDS | |||
Savings - Various Agencies | |||
Potential Reduction in Claims Paid |
$0 to
Unknown |
$0 to
Unknown |
$0 to
Unknown |
Costs - Missouri State Highway Patrol | |||
Increase in Amounts Paid for Workers'
Compensation Cases |
(Unknown, could Exceed $100,000) | (Unknown, could Exceed $100,000) | (Unknown, could Exceed $100,000) |
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON VARIOUS STATE FUNDS | (Unknown) to Unknown | (Unknown) to Unknown | (Unknown) to Unknown |
CONSERVATION COMMISSION FUND | |||
Savings - Department of Conservation | |||
Potential Reduction in Claims Paid |
$0 to
Unknown |
$0 to
Unknown |
$0 to
Unknown |
Costs - Department of Conservation | |||
Increase in Amounts Paid for Workers'
Compensation Cases (Peace Officers) |
(Unknown, less than $100,000) | (Unknown, less than $100,000) | (Unknown, less than $100,000) |
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON CONSERVATION COMMISSION FUND |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
FISCAL IMPACT - State Government | FY 2005
(10 Mo.) |
FY 2006 | FY 2007 |
HIGHWAY FUND | |||
Savings - Department of Transportation | |||
Potential Reduction in Claims Paid |
$0 to
Unknown |
$0 to
Unknown |
$0 to
Unknown |
Costs - Department of Transportation | |||
Increase in Amounts Paid for Workers'
Compensation Cases (Peace Officers) |
(Unknown, less than $100,000) | (Unknown, less than $100,000) | (Unknown, less than $100,000) |
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON HIGHWAY FUND |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government | FY 2005
(10 Mo.) |
FY 2006 | FY 2007 |
VARIOUS LOCAL FUNDS | |||
Savings - Various Local Governments | |||
Reduction in Potential Workers'
Compensation Claims |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Costs - Law Enforcement Agencies | |||
Increase in Out-of-Pocket Costs and
Increase in Contributions Paid to Fund |
(Unknown) |
(Unknown) |
(Unknown) |
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON VARIOUS LOCAL FUNDS | (Unknown) to Unknown | (Unknown) to Unknown | (Unknown) to Unknown |
FISCAL IMPACT - Small Business
This proposal could impact small businesses if there are reductions in the amount of Workers' Compensation benefits paid as a result of passage of this proposal.
DESCRIPTION
This proposal would revise several provisions of the state Workers' Compensation law:
DESCRIPTION (continued)
This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not require additional capital improvements or rental space.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Department of Labor and Industrial Relations
Office of Administration
Division of Risk Management
Division of Budget and Planning
University of Missouri
Mickey Wilson, CPA
Director
January 27, 2004