COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH

OVERSIGHT DIVISION



FISCAL NOTE



L.R. No.: 3142-01

Bill No.: Truly Agreed To and Finally Passed SB 807

Subject: Civil Procedure; Civil Rights; Courts; Evidence; Judges

Type: Original

Date: May 25, 2004




FISCAL SUMMARY



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON GENERAL REVENUE FUND
FUND AFFECTED FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007
Total Estimated

Net Effect on

General Revenue

Fund

$0 $0 $0



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON STATE FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007
Total Estimated

Net Effect on All

State Funds

$0 $0 $0



Numbers within parentheses: ( ) indicate costs or losses.

This fiscal note contains 4 pages.











ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007
Total Estimated

Net Effect on All

Federal Funds

$0 $0 $0



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007
Local Government $0 $0 $0




FISCAL ANALYSIS



ASSUMPTION



Officials from the Office of Administration - Administrative Hearing Commission,

- Commissioner's Office, Department of Labor and Industrial Relations, City of Kansas City, and the City of Springfield assume the proposed legislation would have no fiscal impact on their agencies.



Officials from the Office of Attorney General (AGO) assume the costs can be absorbed within existing resources.



Officials from the Office of State Courts Administrator assume the proposed legislation would have no fiscal impact on the courts.



Officials from the Department of Conservation (MDC) assume the proposed legislation would have an unknown fiscal impact on MDC funds.





ASSUMPTION (continued)



Officials from the Department of Transportation (MoDOT) assume Missouri courts generally follow the "American Rule" in which all parties are responsible for their own costs. This legislation proposes to implement the "English Rule," which provides that the prevailing party be reimbursed for attorneys fees and costs. MoDOT is unable to estimate the number of cases that may fall under this provision. MoDOT assumes an unknown cost to the Highway Fund.



DHT assumes the provisions in the bill would apply to all causes of action, and would substantially increase the potential negative fiscal impact, although the exact amount is unknown. MoDOT assumes this proposal would authorize a court to grant early consideration of a special motion to dismiss, motion for judgment on the pleadings or summary judgment including suspending discovery until a final decision is reached in all causes of action (tort, condemnation, employment actions, etc.). If the provision is construed to all causes of action, then the corresponding provisions awarding attorneys fees to prevailing parties is also expanded to all causes of action.



Oversight assumes state agencies could experience increased costs or be reimbursed for attorneys fees and court costs, depending on whether or not they are the prevailing party. If state agencies experience increased costs, the funding could be addressed through the appropriations process.





FISCAL IMPACT - State Government FY 2005

(10 Mo.)

FY 2006 FY 2007
$0 $0 $0





FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government FY 2005

(10 Mo.)

FY 2006 FY 2007
$0 $0 $0





FISCAL IMPACT - Small Business



Small Businesses could experience a fiscal impact as a result of this proposal.





DESCRIPTION



The proposed legislation would grant early consideration of any action seeking money damages against a person for conduct or speech made in connection with a public hearing or meeting. All pending discovery would be suspended pending a final decision on the motion. The proposal would also mandate that if the rights of this section are used as an affirmative defense and the court grants a motion to dismiss on those grounds, reasonable attorney fees and costs incurred by the moving party would be awarded. If the court finds the motion to dismiss is frivolous, the court would award costs and attorney fees to the prevailing party. If a party would raise the motion under the provisions of this act, the party would have the right to an expedited appeal. The provisions of the proposal would apply to all causes of action.



This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not require additional capital improvements or rental space.





SOURCES OF INFORMATION



Office of Attorney General

Office of Administration

- Administrative Hearing Commission

Office of State Courts Administrator

Department of Transportation

Department of Labor and Industrial Relations

Department of Conservation

City of Kansas City

City of Springfield















Mickey Wilson, CPA

Director

May 25, 2004