COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH

OVERSIGHT DIVISION



FISCAL NOTE



L.R. No.: 1964-01

Bill No.: SB 681

Subject: Civil Procedure; Courts; Civil Rights; Attorneys; Employees-Employers

Type: Original

Date: March 17, 2003




FISCAL SUMMARY



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON GENERAL REVENUE FUND
FUND AFFECTED FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006
Total Estimated

Net Effect on

General Revenue

Fund

$0 $0 $0



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON OTHER STATE FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006
Total Estimated

Net Effect on Other

State Funds

$0 $0 $0



Numbers within parentheses: ( ) indicate costs or losses.

This fiscal note contains 4 pages.















ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006
HUD Fund (Less than $340,000) (Less than $340,000) (Less than $340,000)
Total Estimated

Net Effect on All

Federal Funds





(Less than $340,000)




(Less than $340,000)




(Less than $340,000)




ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006
Local Government $0 $0 $0






FISCAL ANALYSIS



ASSUMPTION



Officials from the Office of Administration - Division of Personnel, Office of Administration - Administrative Hearing Commission, Office of the Attorney General and Office of State Courts Administrator assume this proposal would have no fiscal impact on their agencies.



Officials from the Department of Transportation (MoDOT) assume the number of lawsuits filed may increase due to this proposal. MoDOT states the fiscal impact is indeterminable, therefore it is $0 to negative unknown.



Oversight assumes the potential for an increased number of lawsuits resulting from passage of the proposal is speculative and assigns no fiscal impact.



Officials from the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations (DOL) assume this proposal could place caps on civil actions in housing discrimination cases and this could result in a loss of federal funds from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The DOL states they received a response from HUD which clearly indicates that any caps on damages in housing complaints brought pursuant to section 213.111, RSMo., would lead to a loss of federal funds

from HUD. DOL assumes the loss of funds could include their entire funding allotment which is approximately $340,000 annually.



FISCAL IMPACT - State Government FY 2004

(10 Mo.)

FY 2005 FY 2006
FEDERAL HUD FUND
Loss - DOL
Potential Loss of Funding Due to

Conformity Issue with Proposal

(Less than $340,000) (Less than $340,000) (Less than $340,000)





FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government FY 2004

(10 Mo.)

FY 2005 FY 2006
$0 $0 $0







FISCAL IMPACT - Small Business



No direct fiscal impact to small businesses would be expected as a result of this proposal.





DESCRIPTION



This proposal would amend various provisions regarding the right to civil action for unlawful discriminatory practices. Some of these provisions relate to a cap placed on the civil actions relating to housing discrimination.



This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not require additional capital improvements or rental space.

SOURCES OF INFORMATION



Department of Labor and Industrial Relations

Office of State Courts Administrator

Attorney General's Office

Office of Administration

- Administrative Hearing Commission

- Personnel

Department of Transportation











Mickey Wilson, CPA

Director



March 17, 2003