COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH

OVERSIGHT DIVISION



FISCAL NOTE



L.R. No.: 1238-01

Bill No.: SB 415

Subject: Boards, Commissions, Committees, Councils; Economic Development Dept.; Licenses - Professional; Health Care Professionals

Type: Original

Date: February 28, 2003




FISCAL SUMMARY



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON GENERAL REVENUE FUND
FUND AFFECTED FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006
Total Estimated

Net Effect on

General Revenue

Fund

$0 $0 $0



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON OTHER STATE FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006
Dietitian Fund $115,800 $3,474 $116,840
Total Estimated

Net Effect on Other

State Funds

$115,800 $3,474 $116,840



Numbers within parentheses: ( ) indicate costs or losses.

This fiscal note contains 4 pages.



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006
Total Estimated

Net Effect on All

Federal Funds

$0 $0 $0



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006
Local Government $0 $0 $0






FISCAL ANALYSIS



ASSUMPTION



Officials from the Office of the State Courts Administrator, Office of the State Public Defender, Missouri State Highway Patrol and Department of Corrections assume the proposal would have no fiscal impact on their agencies.



Officials from the Office of Prosecution Services assume any costs resulting from this proposal can be absorbed.



Officials from the Secretary of State's Office (SOS) assume the proposal could result in the Division of Professional Registration promulgating rules. SOS assumes the rules, regulations and forms issued could require as many as eight (8) pages in the Code of State Regulations. SOS notes for any given rule, roughly half again as many pages are published in the Missouri Register as in the Code because cost statements, fiscal notes and the like are not repeated in the Code. SOS estimates the cost of a page in the Missouri Register and the Code of State Regulations to be $23 and $27, respectively. SOS estimates costs of $492 for FY 2004. SOS states the impact of this legislation in future years is unknown and depends upon the frequency and length of rules, filed, amended, rescinded or withdrawn.



Oversight assumes the SOS could absorb the costs of printing and distributing regulations ASSUMPTION (continued)



related to this proposal. If multiple proposals pass which require the printing and distribution of regulations at substantial costs, the SOS could request funding through the appropriation process. Any decision to raise fees to defray costs would likely be made in subsequent fiscal years.



Officials from the Department of Economic Development - Professional Registration (DPR) state this proposal creates mandatory licensure for persons who practice or offer to practice dietetics in the State of Missouri. DPR notes the Missouri Dietetic Association estimates there will be approximately 579 applicants for licensure upon passage of this proposal (effective August 28, 2003). DPR estimates a $200 application fee will be charged and a $190 biennial fee thereafter (renewals occur in odd FYs). DPR calculates a 3% growth rate. DPR assumes all costs can be covered by the board's current appropriation.



This proposal would increase total state revenue.





FISCAL IMPACT - State Government FY 2004

(10 Mo.)

FY 2005 FY 2006
DIETITIAN FUND
Income - DPR
Licensure Fees $115,800 $3,474 $116,840





FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government FY 2004

(10 Mo.)

FY 2005 FY 2006
$0 $0 $0







FISCAL IMPACT - Small Business



No direct fiscal impact to small businesses would be expected as a result of this proposal.





DESCRIPTION



This proposal modifies provisions relating to the licensing of dietitians. Definitions for "dietetics practice" and "registered dietitian" are created. The State Committee of Dietitians is placed within the division of professional registration. The Committee shall assist the division in carrying out the provisions of the Dieticians Practice Act and shall approve the licensing examination.



Certain persons are exempted from the licensure requirements of this proposal provided they do not hold themselves out as a dietitian.



Licensees are allowed to let their license lapse or be put on inactive status, provided the licensee does not practice during the time the license is lapsed or inactive. The proposal creates requirements for maintaining an inactive license and for reinstating a lapsed license. A person practicing with a lapsed or inactive license shall be guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.



This proposal is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not require additional capital improvements or rental space.





SOURCES OF INFORMATION



Office of the State Courts Administrator

Office of the State Public Defender

Missouri State Highway Patrol

Department of Corrections

Office of Prosecution Services

Officials from the Secretary of State's Office

Department of Economic Development - Professional Registration













Mickey Wilson, CPA

Director



February 28, 2003