COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH
OVERSIGHT DIVISION
FISCAL NOTE
L.R. No.: 0866-02
Bill No.: SB 343
Subject: Revenue Dept.; Licenses-Motor Vehicle; Disabilities; Motor Vehicles
Type: Original
Date: February 24, 2003
FISCAL SUMMARY
FUND AFFECTED | FY 2004 | FY 2005 | FY 2006 |
Total Estimated
Net Effect on General Revenue Fund |
$0 | $0 | $0 |
FUND AFFECTED | FY 2004 | FY 2005 | FY 2006 |
Highway Fund | (Unknown > $331,365) | ($269,675) | ($261,070) |
Total Estimated
Net Effect on Other State Funds |
(Unknown > $331,365) | ($269,675) | ($261,070) |
Numbers within parentheses: ( ) indicate costs or losses.
This fiscal note contains 7 pages.
FUND AFFECTED | FY 2004 | FY 2005 | FY 2006 |
Total Estimated
Net Effect on All Federal Funds |
$0 | $0 | $0 |
FUND AFFECTED | FY 2004 | FY 2005 | FY 2006 |
Local Government | $0 | $0 | $0 |
ASSUMPTION
Officials with the Department of Transportation, Office of State Courts Administrator and Department of Health and Senior Services assume this proposal would have no fiscal impact on their agencies.
Officials with the Department of Revenue (DOR) and the Department of Public Safety (DPS) assume their agencies could have fiscal impact associated with this proposal.
Section 301.138
Officials with DPS assume an unknown cost associated with this section of the proposal. DPS cannot determine the number of persons that would apply for a citation granting status. Oversight assumes that this proposal could require DPS to develop procedures, forms and collection means for persons to apply for the citation giving authority. Oversight also assumes this proposal could allow DPS to collect a fifty dollar fee per application and DPS would keep cost at a level equal to their fee collection and therefore create a net of zero for fiscal impact.
ASSUMPTION (continued)
Officials with DOR assume this section could allow a person to apply to DPS for the authority to issue citations. They assume a copy of the citations from a 'certified' person would be sent to the Director of Revenue. DOR assumes this could require their agency to incur cost for tracking the offenders movement through the judicial process and potential suspensions. DOR states the programming and General Counsel cost could be a significant unknown. Oversight notes that the legislation includes permissive language for DOR to give notice and suspend violators. However, this proposal does not make any specific demands on DOR for the tracking and revocation of offenders. Therefore, Oversight assumes that an unknown cost could be incurred by DOR to track the disposition information received from the prosecutor.
With information from the Office of Prosecution Services, Oversight assumes the fiscal impact to the local prosecutors to notify DOR of the disposition of these cases would be minimal.
FY 04 Income and Cost for 301.138
Application fee collected by DPS Unknown
Administrative and Procedural cost to DPS (Unknown)
Programming Salaries for dispositions (Unknown)
Total (Unknown)
FY 05 Income and Cost for 301.138
Application fee collected by DPS Unknown
Administrative and Procedural cost to DPS (Unknown)
Total $0
FY 06 Income and Cost for 301.138
Application fee collected by DPS Unknown
Administrative and Procedural cost to DPS (Unknown)
Total $0
ASSUMPTION (continued)
301.142
DOR assumes this section could require their agency to obtain and store physician statements regarding the eligibility of disabled persons to have a disabled placard. Their agency could incur cost for microfilming the statements and storage at the State Data Center. DOR notes that every four years there could be a surge in overtime cost for the microfilming due to the physician statement requirement every four years. DOR-Information Technology Bureau (ITB) assume they could incur cost for programming the modifications to the General Registration System, renewal pulls, disabled placards system and the Uniformed Field Office System (UFOS).
DOR assumes this section could require their agency to issue a certificate bound in plastic to the holder of a handicap placard. DOR assumes they could incur cost for certificates, laminating machines and pouches.
DOR assumes this section could require their agency to check with vital statistics before the annual renewal of placards. With information from DOR, Oversight assumes that if the FASTR system were available at this time then the cost would be a small unknown.
FY 04 Cost for 301.142
Microfilming Salaries (218 hours) $3,320
Certificates (500,000*$.45) $225,000
Laminating Equipment (185*$199) $36,815
Laminating pouches ((5,000*$6.35) $31,750
Programming Salaries $13,480
Storage at State Data Center $1,000
Programming for vital statistics Unknown
Total $311,365 to Unknown
FY 05 Cost for 301.142
Microfilming Salaries (783 hours) $11,925
Certificates (500,000*$.45) $225,000
Laminating pouches ((5,000*$6.35) $31,750
Storage at State Data Center $1,000
Total $269,675
ASSUMPTION (continued)
FY 06 Cost for Section 301.142
Microfilming Salaries (218 hours) $3,320
Certificates (500,000*$.45) $225,000
Laminating pouches ((5,000*$6.35) $31,750
Storage at State Data Center $1,000
Total $261,070
This proposal could increase state revenue through the application fee collected by DPS for the individuals applying for citation granting status.
FISCAL IMPACT - State Government | FY 2004
(10 Mo.) |
FY 2005 | FY 2006 |
HIGHWAY FUND | |||
Income-DPS | |||
Fee collected* | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown |
Cost-DPS | |||
Administrative cost for certifying* | (Unknown) | (Unknown) | (Unknown) |
Cost- DOR | |||
Microfilming Salaries | ($3,320) | ($11,925) | ($3,320) |
Programming Salaries for physician statements |
($13,480) |
$0 | $0 |
Programming Salaries for vital statistics ** |
(Unknown) |
$0 |
$0 |
Programming Salaries for disposition tracking ** |
(Unknown) |
$0 | $0 |
Certificates and lamination | ($293,565) | ($256,750) | ($256,750) |
Storage | ($1,000) | ($1,000) | ($1,000) |
Total Cost-DOR | (Unknown > $311,365) |
($269,675) |
($261,070) |
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON HIGHWAY FUND | (Unknown > $311,365) | ($269,675) | ($261,070) |
*The Income and Cost for DPS is expected to have a net zero impact
**Unknown programming salaries not expected to exceed $50,000
FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government | FY 2004
(10 Mo.) |
FY 2005 | FY 2006 |
$0 | $0 | $0 |
FISCAL IMPACT - Small Business
No direct fiscal impact to small businesses would be expected as a result of this proposal.
DESCRIPTION
This proposal could require DPS to develop a program and certify qualifying individuals to issue citations for parking in a disabled space without a valid placard. DPS could collect a fifty dollar fee application from those individuals interested in obtaining certification.
This proposal could require DOR to track the dispositions after the citation has been through the judicial system.
This proposal could require DOR to require and maintain physician statements for disabled placards
This proposal could require DOR to issue certificates bound in plastic at the time of renewal.
This proposal could require DOR to check with vital statistics at the time of renewal to prevent issuance of disabled placards to deceased individuals.
This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not require additional capital improvements or rental space.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Department of Revenue
Department of Transportation
Department of Public Safety
Department of Health and Senior Services
Office of State Courts Administrator
Office of Prosecution Services
NOT RESPONDING
Department of Corrections
Mickey Wilson, CPA
Director
February 24, 2003