COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH

OVERSIGHT DIVISION



FISCAL NOTE



L.R. No.: 0431-01

Bill No.: SB 123

Subject: Housing; Business and Commerce; Attorney General, State; Consumer Protection

Type: Original

Date: January 16, 2003




FISCAL SUMMARY



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON GENERAL REVENUE FUND
FUND AFFECTED FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006
General Revenue (UNKNOWN) (UNKNOWN) (UNKNOWN)
Total Estimated

Net Effect on

General Revenue

Fund*

(UNKNOWN) (UNKNOWN) (UNKNOWN)

*Expected to be less than $100,000

ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON OTHER STATE FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006
Total Estimated

Net Effect on Other

State Funds

$0 $0 $0



Numbers within parentheses: ( ) indicate costs or losses.

This fiscal note contains 4 pages.













ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006
Total Estimated

Net Effect on All

Federal Funds

$0 $0 $0



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006
Local Government $0 $0 $0




FISCAL ANALYSIS



ASSUMPTION



Officials from the Department of Economic Development - Division of Finance and Division of Credit Unions, Department of Insurance, Office of State Courts Administrator, and Office of State Public Defender state that this proposed legislation will have no fiscal impact on their agencies.



Officials from the Office of Attorney General have discussed this proposal with officials from the North Carolina Attorney General's office and, based on that office's experience with a similar measure, believe that the costs of this proposal can be absorbed with existing resources.



Officials from the Office of Prosecution Services indicate there will be no additional costs to prosecutors as a result of this proposal.



Officials from the Department of Corrections (DOC) did not respond to a request for fiscal note; however, in response to a similar proposal from last session, DOC assumed supervision through probation or incarceration would result in additional unknown costs to the department. Eight (8) persons would have to have been incarcerated per fiscal year to exceed $100,000 annually. Due to the narrow scope of this new crime, it was assumed the impact would be less than $100,000 per year for the DOC.



FISCAL IMPACT - State Government FY 2004

(10 Mo.)

FY 2005 FY 2006
GENERAL REVENUE FUND

Cost - Department of Corrections

Probation and incarceration expense*



(Unknown)


(Unknown)


(Unknown)

*Expected to be less than $100,000



FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government FY 2004

(10 Mo.)

FY 2005 FY 2006
$0 $0 $0



FISCAL IMPACT - Small Business



This proposal could fiscally impact those small businesses that deal with high-cost home loans.



DESCRIPTION



This proposal regulates high-cost home loans and establishes certain lender reporting requirements. The proposal prohibits specific practices with respect to high-cost home loans, including prepayment penalties, issuing high-cost loans stipulating negative amortization, loan flipping, making misleading statements about a residential home loan transaction, and compensating or intimidating appraisers to influence their judgment with regard to the value of the real estate.



The effective date of this proposal is January 1, 2004, with the exception of Sections 408.756 and 408.758 (reporting requirements) that have an effective date of January 1, 2005



This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not require additional capital improvements or rental space.



















SOURCES OF INFORMATION



Department of Economic Development

Division of Finance

Division of Credit Unions

Department of Insurance

Office of Attorney General

Office of State Courts Administrator

Office of Prosecution Services

Office of State Public Defender



NOT RESPONDING



Department of Corrections







Mickey Wilson, CPA

Director

January 16, 2003