This Fiscal Note is not an official copy and should not be quoted or cited.
Fiscal Note - SJR 011 - Exempts from taxation motor vehicles used primarily for non-business purposes
SJR 11 - Fiscal Note

COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH

OVERSIGHT DIVISION

FISCAL NOTE

L.R. NO. 0448-02

BILL NO. SJR 11

SUBJECT: Constitutional Amendments: Property Tax-Motor Vehicles

TYPE: Original

DATE: February 8, 1999


FISCAL SUMMARY

ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON STATE FUNDS

FUND AFFECTED FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002
General Revenue $0 ($106,000) $0
Total Estimated

Net Effect on All State Funds*

$0 ($106,000) $0

*Losses to the Blind Pension Fund could be $2,200,000 beginning in FY 2003, depending on actions of the legislature. Costs to General Revenue could be $452,000,000 in FY 2003.

ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDS

FUND AFFECTED FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002
None
Total Estimated

Net Effect on All Federal Funds

$0 $0 $0



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDS

FUND AFFECTED FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002
Political Subdivisions** $0 $0 $0

**The County Employees Retirement Fund could lose $3,600,00 per year beginning in FY 2003.

Numbers within parentheses: ( ) indicate costs or losses

This fiscal note contains 4 pages.

FISCAL ANALYSIS

ASSUMPTION

Officials of the State Tax Commission, the Department of Revenue, the Department of Transportation, and the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DES) stated that the proposal would not have meaningful administrative impact on their agencies.

Estimated possible revenue losses assume 93% of motor vehicles ($419 million in tax in 1997) are used for non-business purposes, an average local tax rate of $5.82, and tax collections increasing 3% per year. The Blind Pension Tax rate is $.03.

Oversight notes that the proposal only allows the general assembly to exempt motor vehicles from property tax and would require the state to reimburse political subdivisions for any monies lost due to the exemption.

Officials of the County Employees Retirement Fund note that penalties assessed on entities which return their personal property lists to County Assessors after the deadline (1 March of every year) and some penalties on delinquent personal property tax are deposited in the Fund. Exempting motor vehicles from property tax would eliminate a source of the Fund's income. They estimate a long-term increase in the Fund's shortfall of $45,500,000.

Reducing assessed values could affect amounts needed to fully fund the Foundation Formula. DES officials note that reducing assessed values would start to lower the guaranteed tax base in three years. A reduced guaranteed tax base reduces the inflation adjustment in the Formula for districts to fund inflationary increases of educational and operational increases. Increased costs to fully fund the Formula may "zero out" after the third year the proposal would be in effect.

Oversight notes that if the legislature would pass a law in the 2001 session affecting tax years beginning after December 31, 2001, the impact would not be felt until FY 2003.

Advertisement costs for the proposal would be $3,990 per newspaper column inch for three publications of the text of the proposal, the introduction, title, fiscal note summary, and affidavit. The proposal would be on the ballot for the November 1998 general election.

FISCAL IMPACT - State Government FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002
GENERAL REVENUE FUND
Cost to General Revenue Fund
Secretary of State
Newspaper Advertisements ($106,000)
FISCAL IMPACT - State Government FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002
NET EFFECT ON GENERAL
REVENUE FUND ($106,000)
FISCAL IMPACT - State Government FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005
BLIND PENSION FUND
Loss - Reduced Tax Collections ($2,320,000) ($2,390,000) ($2,460,000)
NET EFFECT ON BLIND
PENSION FUND ($2,320,000) ($2,390,000) ($2,460,000)
GENERAL REVENUE FUND
Cost - Reimbursement of Political
Subdivisions ($452,000,000) ($465,700,000) ($479,700,000)
Cost - Foundation Formula (Unknown) (Unknown) $0
NET EFFECT ON GENERAL
REVENUE FUND ($452,000,000 ($465,700,000 ($479,700,000)
to to
Unknown) Unknown)
FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002
$0 $0 $0
FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005
POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS
Income - Reimbursements from State $452,000,000 $465,700,000 $479,700,000
Loss - Motor Vehicle Property Tax ($452,000,000) ($465,700,000) ($479,700,000)
FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005
(continued)
NET EFFECT ON POLITICAL
SUBDIVISIONS $0 $0 $0
COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT
FUND
Loss - Penalty Income ($3,600,000) ($3,700,000) ($3,800,000)
NET EFFECT ON COUNTY EMPLOYEES
RETIREMENT FUND ($3,600,000) ($3,700,000) ($3,800,000)
FISCAL IMPACT - Small Business
This proposal would affect small businesses. They could benefit from personal property tax provisions.

DESCRIPTION

The proposal would allow the general assembly to exempt all motor vehicles used for non-business purposes from tangible personal property tax. The state would reimburse political subdivisions for monies lost due to the exemption. Reimbursements to political subdivisions would not be part of total state revenues.

This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program, would not

require additional capital improvements or rental space. It would affect Total State Revenue.

SOURCES OF INFORMATION

County Employees Retirement Fund

Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Department of Transportation

Department of Revenue

State Tax Commission

Secretary of State



Jeanne Jarrett, CPA

Director

February 8, 1999