This Fiscal Note is not an official copy and should not be quoted or cited.
Fiscal Note - SB 0108 - Exempts certain political subdivisions from the state prevailing wage
SB 108 - Fiscal Note

COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH

OVERSIGHT DIVISION



FISCAL NOTE

L.R. NO. 0166-04

BILL NO. SB 108

SUBJECT: Prevailing Wage

TYPE: Original

DATE: December 31, 1998


FISCAL SUMMARY

ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON STATE FUNDS

FUND AFFECTED FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002
Natural Resources Dedicated Funds Unknown Unknown Unknown
Partial Estimated

Net Effect on All

State Funds*

Unknown Unknown Unknown

*Unknown savings.

ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDS

FUND AFFECTED FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002
Total Estimated

Net Effect on All

Federal Funds

$0 $0 $0



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDS

FUND AFFECTED FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002
Local Government* Unknown Unknown Unknown

Numbers within parentheses: ( ) indicate costs or losses

This fiscal note contains 4 pages.

*Unknown savings.

FISCAL ANALYSIS

ASSUMPTION

The Office of Administration, Department of Corrections, City of Kansas City, Secretary of State's Office, Department of Agriculture, Department of Economic Development, Department of Social Services, Department of Conservation, Governor's Office, Department of Health, Department of Public Safety, State Tax Commission, Housing Authority of Kansas City, Missouri Veterans Commission, Department of Insurance, House of Representatives, Department of Labor and Industrial Relations, Department of Transportation, Lieutenant Governor's Office, Office of State Courts Administrator, and the County of Boone do not expect to be fiscally impacted.

The Department of Natural Resources (DNR) assumes that it could experience a savings as a result of this proposal, but the amount could not be estimated given the uncertainties of the nature of the contracts (i.e., actual projects, bids, specialties, etc.). The DNR assumes that there could be a labor cost savings on projects exempted from the prevailing wage law and on public works projects funded with department monies. A savings of funds would allow the department to distribute the funds to projects which may have otherwise been unfunded. Oversight has shown an unknown savings.

Oversight assumes this proposal would result in an unknown savings to political subdivisions whose voters decide to opt out of the state prevailing wage provisions that would otherwise be required on public works projects in their communities. However, the federal prevailing wage law, if applicable on a particular project, would still apply.



FISCAL IMPACT - State Government FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002
(10 Mo.)
NATURAL RESOURCES DEDICATED FUNDS
Department of Natural Resources (DNR)
Exemption from Prevailing Wage Unknown Unknown Unknown

PARTIAL ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON

NATURAL RESOURCES DEDICATED
FUNDS Unknown Unknown Unknown
FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002
(10 Mo.)
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
Savings-Other Political Subdivisions
Exemption from Prevailing Wage Law Unknown Unknown Unknown

PARTIAL ESTIMATED NET EFFECT

ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT Unknown Unknown Unknown
FISCAL IMPACT - Small Business
This proposal could have a direct fiscal impact on small businesses as a result of being exempted from the prevailing wage law. This could result in lower costs for small businesses.



DESCRIPTION

The proposal would provide that upon a majority rule of the voters, political subdivisions in any county with an assessed valuation of less than $300 million dollars may choose to be excluded from the state prevailing wage law.

This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not require additional capital improvements or rental space.

SOURCES OF INFORMATION

Department of Labor & Industrial Relations

Office of Administration

Division of Design & Construction

Department of Transportation

Department of Conservation

Department of Natural Resources

Department of Corrections

Department of Economic Development

Department of Agriculture

State Courts Administrator

Department of Health

SOURCES OF INFORMATION (Cont'd)

Department of Social Services

Department of Public Safety

Governor's Office

House of Representatives

Department of Insurance

Lieutenant Governor's Office

Secretary of State

Tax Commission

Boone County

City of Kansas City

Kansas City Housing Authority



NOT RESPONDING: St. Louis County, Attorney General's Office, Higher Education, Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, Department of Mental Health, Gaming Commission, Department of Revenue, Lottery Commission, State Auditor's Office, Senate, State Treasurer's Office, City of St. Louis, Cole County, Greene County.







Jeanne Jarrett, CPA

Director

December 31, 1998