This Fiscal Note is not an official copy and should not be quoted or cited.
Fiscal Note - SB 0620 - Prohibits Retaliatory Evictions of Tenants
L.R. NO.  2432-01
BILL NO.  SB 620
SUBJECT:  Landlord/Tenant Relations
TYPE:     Original
DATE:     January 3, 1996



                              FISCAL SUMMARY
                    ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON STATE FUNDS


FUND AFFECTED              FY 1997             FY 1998           FY 1999
NONE                            $0                  $0                $0

Total Estimated
Net Effect on All
State Funds                     $0                  $0                $0

                   ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDS


FUND AFFECTED              FY 1997             FY 1998           FY 1999
NONE                            $0                  $0                $0

Total Estimated
Net Effect on All
Federal Funds                   $0                  $0                $0

                    ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDS


FUND AFFECTED              FY 1997             FY 1998           FY 1999
Local Government                $0                  $0                $0


                              FISCAL ANALYSIS

ASSUMPTION

Officials from the Office of State Courts Administrator assume that the
proposed legislation may cause some landlord/tenant cases to become more
protracted, but the workload impact upon the judiciary should not be
significant.

FISCAL IMPACT - State Government FY 1997   FY 1998   FY 1999
                                (10 Mo.)

                                      $0        $0        $0

FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government FY 1997   FY 1998   FY 1999
                                (10 Mo.)

                                      $0        $0        $0

DESCRIPTION

The proposed legislation would prohibit landlords from raising rent or
terminating a lease in retaliation for the filing of a housing violation
complaint against the landlord.  If the notice to terminate or increase the
rent came within ninety days of a housing code violation complaint, the
burden of proof would be on the landlord.  In the case of a retaliatory rent
increase, the court would allow the tenant to remit the rent less twice the
amount of increase.

This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other
program and would not require additional capital improvements or rental
space.

SOURCES OF INFORMATION

Office of State Courts Administrator