SB 632 Modifies provisions relating to dog fighting
Sponsor: Cunningham
LR Number: 3637S.01I Fiscal Note:
Committee: Judiciary and Civil and Criminal Jurisprudence
Last Action: 1/13/2010 - Second Read and Referred S Judiciary and Civil and Criminal Jurisprudence Committee Journal Page: S114
Title: Calendar Position:
Effective Date: August 28, 2010

Full Bill Text | All Actions | Available Summaries | Senate Home Page | List of 2010 Senate Bills

Current Bill Summary


SB 632 - This act increases the penalty for being a spectator at a dog fighting event from a Class A misdemeanor to a Class D felony for a second or subsequent offense.

A person performing a lawful seizure because of a dog fighting violation, whether acting under the authority of a warrant or not, shall be given a disposition hearing within 30 days of the filing of the request in order to grant immediate disposition of the impounded dog. The person seizing the dog shall place it in the care of a veterinarian, animal shelter, or animal control authority. If such people are not available, the dog shall not be impounded unless diseased or disabled. The dog shall be humanely killed if a veterinarian determines the dog is diseased or disabled beyond recovery. No person who lawfully seizes a dog shall be liable for necessary property damage.

Owners of an impounded dog may prevent disposition of the dog by posting bond in an amount sufficient to cover the dog's care for 30 days. The authority with custody may dispose of the dog at the end of such time unless there is a court order prohibiting it. The court order shall provide for a bond or other security in an amount to cover the cost of care, keeping, or disposal of the dog.

The owner of a dog humanely killed under these provisions shall not be entitled to recover damages for the value of the dog if it was found by a veterinarian to be diseased or disabled or if the owner failed to post bond for its care and disposition after being notified of the impoundment.

This act continues to allow highway patrol officers and other law enforcement officers making an arrest to take possession of a dog subject to a dog fighting violation; however, it repeals the provision requiring the court to order an officer to keep such dogs until the final decision of the court on the charges.

This act is similar to SB 819 (2008), HCS/HB 2416 (2008), SB 63 (2009), SB 201 (2009), and SB 664 (2010).

SUSAN HENDERSON MOORE