Journal of the Senate
SECOND REGULAR SESSION
FIFTY-EIGHTH DAY--THURSDAY, APRIL 23, 1998
Senator Johnson in the Chair.
The Chaplain offered the following prayer:
Our Father in Heaven, the Bible tells us of those who have eyes but cannot see and ears but cannot hear. Forgive us when we see and hear only what we want, when we cannot see those who are in need or hear the cries of the poor. In Jesus Name we pray. Amen.
The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was recited.
A quorum being established, the Senate proceeded with its business.
The Journal of the previous day was read and approved.
The following Senators were present during the day's proceedings:
| Present--Senators | |||
| Banks | Bentley | Caskey | Childers |
| Clay | Curls | DePasco | Ehlmann |
| Flotron | Goode | Graves | House |
| Howard | Jacob | Johnson | Kenney |
| Kinder | Klarich | Lybyer | Mathewson |
| Maxwell | McKenna | Mueller | Quick |
| Rohrbach | Russell | Schneider | Scott |
| Sims | Singleton | Staples | Westfall |
| Wiggins | Yeckel--34 | ||
| Absent with leave--Senators--None | |||
| The Lieutenant Governor was present. | |||
CONCURRENT RESOLUTIONS
Senator Quick offered the following concurrent resolution:
SENATE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 39
WHEREAS, the general assembly is continually asked to act upon measures dealing with complex and controversial subjects; and
WHEREAS, such measures frequently require lengthy and comprehensive study and evaluation; and
WHEREAS, the committee system of evaluation of proposed legislation has proven its worth time and again to the entire membership of the general assembly:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the members of the Missouri Senate, the House of Representatives concurring therein, that the standing committees of each house and such other committees of the Senate and House of Representatives as the president pro tem or the speaker shall designate may meet with the approval of the president pro tem or speaker, as the case may be, to consider bills or to perform any other necessary legislative function during the interim prior to the convening of the 90th general assembly; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the actual and necessary expenses of the members of each committee incurred while attending meetings of those committees, and the expense of the research and clerical personnel assigned thereto, be paid from the appropriate House or Senate contingent fund.
Senator Quick requested unanimous consent to suspend the rules and take SCR 39 up for adoption, which request was granted.
President Pro Tem McKenna assumed the Chair.
On motion of Senator Quick, SCR 39 was adopted by the following vote:
| YEAS--Senators | |||
| Bentley | Caskey | Childers | Clay |
| DePasco | Ehlmann | Flotron | Goode |
| Graves | House | Howard | Jacob |
| Johnson | Kenney | Kinder | Klarich |
| Mathewson | Maxwell | McKenna | Mueller |
| Quick | Rohrbach | Russell | Scott |
| Sims | Singleton | Staples | Westfall |
| Wiggins | Yeckel--30 | ||
| NAYS--Senators--None | |||
| Absent--Senators | |||
| Banks | Curls | Lybyer | Schneider--4 |
| Absent with leave--Senators--None | |||
Senators Maxwell and Rohrbach offered the following concurrent resolution, which was referred to the Committee on Rules, Joint Rules and Resolutions:
SENATE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 40
WHEREAS, crime is both a threat to the safety of the citizens of this state and a drain on the resources of this state that would otherwise be available to promote the general welfare of citizens; and
WHEREAS, the correctional system is charged with the administration of punishment for violations of criminal laws which protect Missourians; and
WHEREAS, the budget of the state's correctional system has grown rapidly over the past five years, a result of the increase in certain drug-related crimes as well as changes in sentencing statutes; and
WHEREAS, the correctional system is responsible for the supervision of approximately 77,100 individuals, over 23,380 of whom are in the custody of correctional institutions and over 53,720 of whom are on probation or parole; and
WHEREAS, the institutional population of the Department of Corrections has increased 52% over the past five fiscal years; and
WHEREAS, the caseload of the Board of Probation and Parole has increased 34% over the past five fiscal years; and
WHEREAS, the average annual cost to house one inmate in the correctional system, excluding capital costs, is $11,084, which represents a 20% increase in cost over the past five fiscal years; and
WHEREAS, the criminal code of this state has not been reviewed since 1977 to determine the range, consistency and appropriateness of penalties imposed for various types of crimes;
WHEREAS, the Department of Corrections is currently funded to plan and construct approximately 9,000 new permanent beds to accommodate the projected increase in population at an estimated cost of $369 million; and
WHEREAS, the additional funds necessary to support an expanding correctional system diminishes the state's ability to provide educational benefits for children;
WHEREAS, the financial demands of the correctional system also compete with the state's ability to provide services and economic opportunities necessary for a stable environment for families;
WHEREAS, the increasing amount of financial resources devoted to the correctional system is a burden on the taxpayers of the state;
WHEREAS, state investments in providing services and opportunities for its citizens can contribute to crime prevention;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the members of the Senate, Eighty-ninth General Assembly, the House of Representatives concurring therein, that a joint legislative study committee of the General Assembly be created to be composed of seven members of the Senate, to be appointed by the President Pro Tem of the Senate, and seven members of the House of Representatives, to be appointed by the Speaker of the House; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that an advisory council may be created by the committee, with nine citizen members with experience in and knowledge of the issues to be addressed, one from each congressional district in the state;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said committee conduct an in-depth study and make appropriate recommendations concerning revisions to the criminal code, additional measures to enhance sure, swift and fair punishment, ways to encourage the prevention of crime, cost effective methods of treatment for individuals as an alternative to custody within correctional centers, types of programs to deter repeat offenders, and any other issues the committee deems relevant;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the committee prepare a report, together with its recommendations for any legislative action it deems necessary for submission to the General Assembly no later than December 15, 1998; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the committee may solicit any input and information necessary to fulfill its obligations from the Judiciary, Department of Public Safety, Department of Corrections, and representatives of citizen groups formed to address criminal justice issues; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Committee on Legislative Research, Senate Research and House Research shall provide such legal, research, clerical, technical and bill drafting services as the committee may require in performance of its duties; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the actual and necessary expenses of the committee, its members and any staff personnel assigned to the committee incurred in attending meetings of the committee or any subcommittee thereof shall be paid from the Joint Contingent Fund; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Secretary of the Senate be instructed to prepare properly inscribed copies of this resolution shall be delivered to the Governor and the Chief Justice.
RESOLUTIONS
Senator Wiggins offered the following resolution, which was adopted:
SENATE RESOLUTION NO. 1670
WHEREAS, the members of the Missouri Senate have been pleased to learn that Reverend Joseph M. Freeman, S.J., is completing 53 years as a Professor on the faculty of Rockhurst College, Kansas City; and
WHEREAS, Father Freeman, a native of Omaha, Nebraska, will announce Friday evening, April 24th, at a Rockhurst College Faculty Dinner, his retirement from teaching at Rockhurst; and
WHEREAS, as Professor of Philosophy for 53 years at Rockhurst, Father Freeman has been the pre-eminent member of the faculty, whose teaching has benefited the lives of thousands of students, whose later lifetime works, wherever they are in the world, have been enriched by his profound influence; and
WHEREAS, Father Freeman, has been the hero of Rockhurst students and has been selected by the students as their best and most popular professor;
WHEREAS, our colleague, the current Senator from the 10th District, Senator Harry Wiggins, the sponsor of the Resolution, is himself a graduate of Rockhurst College who spent four semesters in Father Freeman's classes;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the members of the Missouri Senate pause in their deliberations to salute the outstanding service by Father Joseph Freeman, as Professor of Philosophy at Rockhurst College for 53 years, which may well be a record, express their appreciation for his profound and incredible influence on thousands of students, and extend to Father Freeman, very best wishes for many long years continued good health and happiness; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Secretary of the Senate be instructed to prepare properly inscribed copies of this resolution for Reverend Joseph M. Freeman, S.J. and Rockhurst College.
REPORTS OF STANDING COMMITTEES
Senator Quick, Chairman of the Committee on Rules, Joint Rules and Resolutions, submitted the following reports:
Mr. President: Your Committee on Rules, Joint Rules and Resolutions, to which were referred SB 745 and SB 709, begs leave to report that it has examined the same and finds that the bills have been truly perfected and that the printed copies furnished the Senators are correct.
SENATE BILLS FOR PERFECTION
Senator House moved that SB 862 be taken up for perfection, which motion prevailed.
Senator House offered SA 1:
SENATE AMENDMENT NO. 1
Amend Senate Bill No. 862, Page 1, Section 166.400, Line 2, by striking said line and inserting in lieu thereof, the following: "the 'Missouri Family Higher Education Savings Plan'."; and
Further amend said bill, page 1, section 166.410, line 9, by striking "MOSTARS" and inserting in lieu thereof, the following: "Missouri family"; and further amend said section, line 13, by striking said line and inserting in lieu thereof, the following: "(5) 'Missouri family higher education savings plan' or 'savings plan', the"; and
Further amend said bill, page 2, section 166.415, line 1, by striking "MOSTARS" and inserting in lieu thereof, the following: "Missouri family"; and further amend said section, line 2, by striking "Program" and inserting in lieu thereof, the following: "Plan"; and further amend said line by striking "MOSTARS" and inserting in lieu thereof, the following: "Missouri family"; and further amend said section, line 10, by striking "MOSTARS higher education savings program" and inserting in lieu thereof, the following: "Missouri family higher education savings plan"; and
Further amend said bill, page 4, section 166.430, line 5, by striking "that no".
Senator House moved that the above amendment be adopted, which motion prevailed.
At the request of Senator House, SB 862, as amended, was placed on the Informal Calendar.
Senator Quick moved that SB 852 and SB 913, with SCS, be taken up for perfection, which motion prevailed.
SCS for SBs 852 and 913, entitled:
SENATE COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR
SENATE BILLS NOS. 852 and 913
An Act to repeal sections 30.270, 361.080, 362.044, 362.245, 362.250, 408.551, 490.250 and 513.430, RSMo 1994, and sections 319.100, 319.131, 362.105, 362.413, 408.140, 427.125 and 473.543, RSMo Supp. 1997, and to enact in lieu thereof twenty-one new sections relating to banking.
Was taken up.
Senator Quick moved that SCS for SBs 852 and 913 be adopted.
Senator Quick offered SS for SCS for SBs 852 and 913, entitled:
SENATE SUBSTITUTE FOR
SENATE COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR
SENATE BILLS NOS. 852 & 913
An Act to repeal sections 30.270, 361.080, 362.044, 362.245, 362.250, 408.551, 408.653, 490.250 and 513.430, RSMo 1994, and sections 319.100, 319.131, 362.413, 408.140, 427.125 and 473.543, RSMo Supp. 1997, and to enact in lieu thereof twenty new sections relating to banking.
Senator Quick moved that SS for SCS for SBs 852 and 913 be adopted, which motion prevailed.
On motion of Senator Quick, SS for SCS for SBs 852 and 913 was declared perfected and ordered printed.
SB 485, with SCS, was placed on the Informal Calendar.
Senator Sims moved that SB 771 and SB 687, with SCS, be taken up for perfection, which motion prevailed.
SCS for SBs 771 and 687, entitled:
SENATE COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR
SENATE BILLS NOS. 771 and 687
An Act to repeal sections 210.720, 211.183, 211.464 and 453.160 RSMo 1994, and sections 192.016, 211.444, 211.171, 211.447, 452.402, 453.010, 453.025, 453.030, 453.040, 453.060, 453.070, 453.075, 453.077, 453.080, 453.110 and 453.170, RSMo Supp. 1997, relating to adoption, and to enact in lieu thereof twenty new sections relating to the same subject, with an emergency clause.
Was taken up.
Senator Sims moved that SCS for SBs 771 and 687 be adopted.
Senator Mathewson assumed the Chair.
Senator Sims offered SS for SCS for SBs 771 and 687, entitled:
SENATE SUBSTITUTE FOR
SENATE COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR
SENATE BILLS NOS. 771 & 687
An Act to repeal sections 210.720, 211.183, 211.464 and 453.160 RSMo 1994, and sections 192.016, 211.444, 211.171, 211.447, 452.402, 453.010, 453.025, 453.030, 453.040, 453.060, 453.070, 453.075, 453.077, 453.080, 453.110, 453.170 and 568.175, RSMo Supp. 1997, relating to adoption, and to enact in lieu thereof twenty-one new sections relating to the same subject, with an emergency clause and penalty provisions.
Senator Sims moved that SS for SCS for SBs 771 and 687 be adopted.
Senator McKenna offered SA 1:
SENATE AMENDMENT NO. 1
Amend Senate Substitute for Senate Committee Substitute for Senate Bills Nos. 771 and 687, Page 1, In the Title, Line 7 of said title, by striking the word "adoption" and inserting in lieu thereof the following: "child custody and child support proceedings"; and
Further amend said bill, Page 1, Section A, Line 9 of said page, by inserting immediately after all of said line the following:
"104.540. 1. All premium payments and deferred compensation provided for under sections 104.320 to 104.540 are hereby made obligations of the state of Missouri. No alteration, amendment, or repeal of sections 104.320 to 104.540 shall affect the then existing rights of members and beneficiaries, but shall be effective only as to rights which would otherwise accrue hereunder as a result of services rendered by an employee after such alteration, amendment, or repeal.
2. Any annuity, benefits, funds, property, or rights created by, or accruing or paid to, any person under the provisions of sections 104.320 to 104.540 shall not be subject to execution, garnishment, attachment, writ of sequestration, or any other process or claim whatsoever, and shall be unassignable, except [that] with regard to the collection of child support or maintenance. Any retired member of the system may request the executive director of the system, in writing, to withhold and pay on his behalf to the proper person, from each of his monthly retirement benefit payments, if the payment is large enough, the contribution due from the retired member to any group providing prepaid hospital care and any group providing prepaid medical and surgical care and any group providing life insurance when such group is composed entirely of members of the system.
3. The executive director of the system shall, when requested in writing by a retired member, withhold and pay over the funds authorized in subsection 2 of this section until such time as the request to do so is revoked by the death or written revocation of the retired member."; and
Further amend said bill, Page 4, Section 192.016, Line 4 of said page, by inserting immediately after all of said line the following:
"193.215. 1. A certificate or report registered pursuant to sections 193.005 to 193.325 may be amended only pursuant to the provisions of sections 193.005 to 193.325, and regulations adopted by the department.
2. A certificate or report that is amended pursuant to this section shall be marked "Amended" except as otherwise provided in this section. The date of amendment and a summary description of the evidence submitted in support of the amendment shall be endorsed on or made part of the record.
3. Upon receipt of a certified copy of an order of a court of competent jurisdiction changing the name of a person born in this state and upon request of such person or such person's parents, guardian, or legal representative, the state registrar shall amend the certificate of birth to show the new name. The court order shall include such facts as are necessary to locate and identify the certificate of birth of the person whose name is being changed.
4. When an applicant does not submit the minimum documentation required in the regulations for amending a vital record or when the state registrar has reasonable cause to question the validity or adequacy of the applicant's sworn statements or the documentary evidence, and if the deficiencies are not corrected, the state registrar shall not amend the vital record and shall advise the applicant of the reason for this action and the applicant's right of appeal to a court of competent jurisdiction.
5. When a certificate or report is amended pursuant to this section, the state registrar shall report the amendment to any other custodians of the vital record and their record shall be amended accordingly.
6. Upon written request of both parents and receipt of a sworn acknowledgment of paternity notarized and signed by both parents of a child born out of wedlock, the state registrar shall amend the certificate of birth to show such paternity. The acknowledgment affidavit form shall be developed by the state registrar and shall include the minimum requirements prescribed by the secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 652(a)(7). The acknowledgment form shall include provisions to allow the parents to change the surname of the child and such surname shall be changed on the birth record if the parents elect to change the child's surname. The signature of the parents shall be notarized or the signature shall be witnessed by at least two disinterested adults whose signatures and addresses shall be plainly written thereon. The form shall be accompanied by oral notice, which may be provided through the use of video or audio equipment, and written notice to the mother and putative father of:
(1) The alternatives to, the legal consequences of, and the rights and responsibilities that arise from signing the acknowledgment;
(2) The benefits of having the child's paternity established; and
(3) The availability of paternity establishment and child support enforcement services. A rescission of acknowledgment form shall be filed with the bureau of vital records pursuant to section 210.823, RSMo, to vacate the legal finding of paternity. The bureau shall file all rescissions and forward a copy of each to the division of child support enforcement. The birth record shall only be changed pursuant to this subsection upon an order of the court or the division of child support enforcement.
7. The department shall offer voluntary paternity establishment services.
8. Upon receipt of a certified copy of an order of a court of competent jurisdiction changing the name of a person born in this state and upon request of such person or such person's parents, guardian or legal representative, the state registrar shall amend the certificate of birth to show the new name.
9. Upon receipt of a certified copy of an order of a court of competent jurisdiction indicating the sex of an individual born in this state has been changed by surgical procedure and that such individual's name has been changed, the certificate of birth of such individual shall be amended.
210.109. 1. The division of family services shall establish a child protection system [in eight areas of the state selected by the division] for the entire state.
2. The child protection system shall seek to promote the safety of children and the integrity and preservation of their families by conducting investigations or family assessments in response to reports of child abuse or neglect. The system shall endeavor to coordinate community resources and provide assistance or services to children and families identified to be at risk, and to prevent and remedy child abuse and neglect.
3. In implementing the child protection system, the division shall:
(1) Receive and maintain reports pursuant to the provisions of subsections 1 and 2 of section 210.145;
(2) Forward the report to the appropriate division staff who shall determine, through the use of protocols developed by the division, whether an investigation or the family assessment and services approach should be used to respond to the allegation. The protocols developed by the division shall give priority to ensuring the well-being and safety of the child. The division may investigate any report, but shall conduct an investigation involving reports, which if true, would constitute a violation of section 565.050, RSMo, if the victim is a child less than eighteen years of age, a violation of section 566.030 or 566.060, RSMo, if the victim is a child less than eighteen years of age, or any other violation of chapter 566, RSMo, if the victim is a child less than eighteen years of age and the perpetrator is twenty-one years of age or older, a violation of section 567.050, RSMo, if the victim is a child less than eighteen years of age, a violation of section 568.020, 568.030, 568.045, 568.050, 568.060, 568.080, or 568.090, RSMo, a violation of section 573.025 or 573.035, RSMo, or an attempt to commit any such crimes;
(3) Communicate reports of child abuse or neglect to the appropriate local office, pursuant to the provisions of subsection 4 of section 210.145;
(4) Contact the appropriate law enforcement agency upon receipt of a report of a violation of section 565.020, 565.021, 565.023, 565.024 or 565.050, RSMo, if the victim is a child less than eighteen years of age, a violation of section 566.030 or 566.060, RSMo, if the victim is a child less than eighteen years of age, or any other violation of chapter 566, RSMo, if the victim is a child less than eighteen years of age and the perpetrator is twenty-one years of age or older, a violation of section 567.050, RSMo, if the victim is a child less than eighteen years of age, a violation of section 568.020, 568.030, 568.045, 568.050, 568.060, 568.080, or 568.090, RSMo, a violation of section 573.025 or 573.035, RSMo, or an attempt to commit any such crimes, and shall provide such agency with a detailed description of the report received. The appropriate law enforcement agency shall assist the division in the investigation or provide the division, within a reasonable time, an explanation in writing detailing the reasons why it is unable to assist;
(5) Cause a thorough investigation or family assessment and services approach to be initiated within twenty-four hours of receipt of the report from the division, except in cases where the sole basis for the report is educational neglect. If the report indicates that educational neglect is the only complaint and there is no suspicion of other neglect or abuse, the investigation or family assessment and services approach shall be initiated within seventy-two hours of receipt of the report. If the report indicates the child is in danger of serious physical harm or threat to life, an investigation or family assessment and services approach shall include direct observation of the subject child within twenty-four hours of the receipt of the report;
(6) Investigate, if it is determined that an investigation is necessary, in compliance with the provisions of section 210.145;
(7) Assess, in cases where the family assessment and services approach is used, any service needs of the family. The assessment of risk and service needs shall be based on information gathered from the family and other sources;
(8) Provide services, in cases in which the family assessment and services approach is used, which are voluntary and time-limited unless it is determined by the division based on the assessment of risk that there will be a high risk of abuse or neglect if the family refuses to accept the services. The division shall identify services for families where it is determined that the child is at high risk of future abuse or neglect. The division shall thoroughly document in the record its attempt to provide voluntary services and the reasons these services are important to reduce the risk of future abuse or neglect to the child. If the family continues to refuse voluntary services or the child needs to be protected, the division may commence an investigation;
(9) Commence an immediate investigation if at any time during the family assessment and services approach the division determines that an investigation, as delineated in sections 210.109 to 210.183, is required. The division staff who have conducted the assessment may remain involved in the provision of services to the child and family;
(10) Document at the time the case is closed, the outcome of the family assessment and services approach, any service provided and the removal of risk to the child, if it existed;
(11) Conduct a family assessment and services approach on reports initially referred for an investigation, if it is determined that a complete investigation is not required. If law enforcement officers are involved in the investigation, they shall provide written agreement with this decision. The reason for the termination of the investigative process shall be documented in the record;
(12) Assist the child and family in obtaining services, if at any time during the investigation it is determined that the child or any member of the family needs services;
(13) Collaborate with the community to identify comprehensive local services and assure access to those services for children and families where there is risk of abuse or neglect;
(14) Contact the person who made the report under section 210.115, pursuant to the provisions of section 210.145;
(15) Forward any evidence of malice or harassment to the local prosecuting or circuit attorney as required by the provisions of section 210.145;
(16) Provide services as required by section 210.145;
(17) Use multidisciplinary services as required by section 210.145;
(18) Update the information in the information system within thirty days of an oral report of abuse or neglect. The information system shall contain, at a minimum, the determination made by the division as a result of the investigation or family assessment and services approach, identifying information on the subjects of the report, those responsible for the care of the subject child and other relevant dispositional information. The division shall complete all investigations or family assessments within thirty days, unless good cause for the failure to complete the investigation or assessment is documented in the information system. If the investigation or family assessment is not completed within thirty days the information system shall be updated at regular intervals and upon the completion of the investigation. The information in the information system shall be updated to reflect any subsequent findings, including any changes to the findings based on an administrative or judicial hearing on the matter;
(19) Maintain a record which contains the facts ascertained which support the determination as well as the facts that do not support the determination.
4. By January 1, 1998, the division of family services shall submit documentation to the speaker of the house of representatives and the president pro tem of the senate on the success or failure of the child protection system established in this section. The general assembly may recommend statewide implementation or cancellation of the child protection system based on the success or failure of the system established in this section.
5. The documentation required by subsection 4 of this section shall include an independent evaluation of the child protection system completed according to accepted, objective research principles."; and
Further amend said bill, Page 5, Section 210.720, Line 14 of said page, by inserting immediately after all of said line the following:
"210.822. 1. A man shall be presumed to be the natural father of a child if:
(1) He and the child's natural mother are or have been married to each other and the child is born during the marriage, or within three hundred days after the marriage is terminated by death, annulment, declaration of invalidity, or dissolution, or after a decree of separation is entered by a court; or
(2) Before the child's birth, he and the child's natural mother have attempted to marry each other by a marriage solemnized in apparent compliance with the law, although the attempted marriage is or may be declared invalid, and:
(a) If the attempted marriage may be declared invalid only by a court, the child is born during the attempted marriage or within three hundred days after its termination by death, annulment, declaration of invalidity or dissolution; or
(b) If the marriage is invalid without a court order, the child is born within three hundred days after the termination of cohabitation; or
(3) After the child's birth, he and the child's natural mother have married or attempted to marry each other by a marriage solemnized in apparent compliance with law, although the marriage is or may be declared invalid, and:
(a) He has acknowledged his paternity of the child in writing filed with the bureau; or
(b) With his consent, he is named as the child's father on the child's birth certificate [before July 1, 1997]; or
(c) He is obligated to support the child pursuant to a written voluntary promise or by court order; or
(4) An expert concludes that the blood tests show that the alleged parent is not excluded and that the probability of paternity is ninety-eight percent or higher, using a prior probability of 0.5.
2. A presumption pursuant to this section may be rebutted in an appropriate action only by clear and convincing evidence, except that a presumption under subsection 1 of this section that arises from a blood test or the filing of an acknowledgment of paternity in a state or territory in which the blood test or the filing creates a conclusive presumption by law also has conclusive effect in Missouri. If two or more presumptions arise which conflict with each other, the presumption which on the facts is founded on the weightier considerations of policy and logic controls. The presumption is rebutted by a court decree establishing the paternity of the child by another man.
210.826. 1. A child, his natural mother, a man presumed to be his father under [subdivision (1), (2), or (3) of] subsection 1 of section 210.822, a man alleging himself to be a father, any person having physical or legal custody of a child for a period of more than sixty days or the division of child support enforcement may bring an action at any time for the purpose of declaring the existence or nonexistence of the father and child relationship presumed under [subdivision (1), (2), or (3) of] subsection 1 of section 210.822.
2. [Any interested party may bring an action at any time for the purpose of determining the existence or nonexistence of the father and child relationship presumed under subdivision (4) of subsection 1 of section 210.822.
3.] An action to determine the existence of the father and child relationship with respect to a child who has no presumed father under section 210.822 may be brought by the child, the mother or the person who has legal custody of the child, any person having physical or legal custody of a child for a period of more than sixty days, the division of child support enforcement, the personal representative or a parent of the mother if the mother has died, a man alleging himself to be the father, or the personal representative or a parent of the alleged father if the alleged father has died or is a minor.
[4.] 3. Regardless of its terms, an agreement, other than an agreement approved by the court in accordance with subsection 2 of section 210.838, between an alleged or presumed father and the mother or child, does not bar an action under this section.
[5.] 4. If an action under this section is brought before the birth of the child, all proceedings shall be stayed until after the birth, except service of process and the taking of depositions to perpetuate testimony.
210.830. The child shall be made a party to any action commenced under sections 210.817 to 210.852. If he is a minor, he may be represented by a next friend appointed for him for any such action. The child's mother [or father or], the division of child support enforcement or any person having physical or legal custody of the child may represent him as his next friend. A guardian ad litem shall be appointed for the child only if child abuse or neglect is alleged, or if the child is named as a defendant, or if the court determines that the interests of the child and his next friend are in conflict. The natural mother, each man presumed to be the father under section 210.822, and each man alleged to be the natural father, shall be made parties or, if not subject to the jurisdiction of the court, shall be given notice of the action in a manner prescribed by the court and an opportunity to be heard. The court may align the parties.
210.844. In a proceeding to determine the existence of the parent and child relationship brought pursuant to the provisions of sections 454.010 to 454.360, RSMo, or pursuant to the provisions of sections 454.850 to 454.997, RSMo, the provisions of sections 210.817, 210.822 and 210.834, RSMo, shall apply, but no other provisions of sections 210.818 through 210.852, RSMo, shall apply."; and
Further amend said bill, Page 20, Section 211.464, Line 1 of said page, by inserting immediately after all of said line the following:
"287.820. 1. Retirement benefits shall be paid to the retired person in equal monthly installments during the remainder of the person's life. The annual amount of benefits paid shall be equal to fifty percent of the highest salary received during the person's period of service.
2. Except as provided in section 104.312, RSMo, any annuity, benefits, funds, property or rights created by, or accruing to, any person under the provisions of sections 287.812 to 287.855 shall not be subject to execution, garnishment, attachment, writ of sequestration, or any other process or claim whatsoever, and shall be unassignable, except [that] with regard to the collection of child support or maintenance. Any retired member of the system may request the executive director of the system, in writing, to withhold and pay on the retired member's behalf to the proper person, from each of the retired member's monthly retirement benefit payments, if the payment is large enough, the contribution due from the retired member to any group providing prepaid hospital care and any group providing prepaid medical and surgical care when such group is composed entirely of members of the system.
3. The executive director of the system shall, when requested in writing by a retired member, withhold and pay over the funds authorized in subsection 2 of this section until such time as the request to do so is revoked by the death or written revocation of the retired member.
4. Beginning January 1, 1989, any person who was employed prior to August 28, 1997, who is receiving or thereafter shall receive retirement benefits pursuant to sections 287.812 to 287.855 upon application to the board of trustees of the Missouri state employees' retirement system shall be made, constituted, appointed, and employed by the board as a special consultant on the problems of retirement, aging and other state matters for the remainder of the person's life. Upon request of the board or the court from which the person retired, the consultant shall give opinions or be available to give opinions in writing or orally in response to such requests. As compensation the consultant shall receive in addition to all other compensation provided by law a percentage increase in compensation each year computed upon the total amount that the consultant received in the previous year from state retirement benefits of eighty percent of the increase in the consumer price index calculated in the manner specified in section 104.415, RSMo. Any such annual increase in compensation, however, shall not exceed five percent, nor be less than four percent. The total increase in compensation pursuant to the provisions of this subsection to each special consultant who also receives benefits pursuant to sections 287.812 to 287.855 shall not exceed sixty-five percent of the initial benefit that the person receives after August 31, 1987. The total increase in compensation pursuant to the provisions of this subsection to each special consultant who also receives benefits pursuant to sections 287.812 to 287.855 shall not exceed sixty-five percent of the initial benefit that the person receives after January 1, 1989.
5. As additional compensation for the services described in subsection 4 of this section, each special consultant shall receive an annual percentage increase in the retirement benefit payable equal to eighty percent of the increase in the consumer price index. Such benefit increase, however, shall not exceed five percent of the retirement benefit payable prior to the increase. The annual benefit increase described in this subsection shall not be effective until the year in which the special consultant reaches the limit on total annual increases provided by subsection 4 of this section. During that year on the anniversary date of the special consultant's retirement, the special consultant shall receive the benefit increase described in subsection 4 of this section or this subsection, whichever is greater. After that year, the special consultant shall receive the annual benefit increase described in this subsection. Any special consultant who reaches the limit on total annual benefit increases provided by subsection 4 of this section prior to October 1, 1996, shall receive the benefit increase described in this subsection on September 1, 1997. Any special consultant who reaches the limit on total annual benefit increases provided by subsection 4 of this section on or after October 1, 1996, but before September 1, 1997, shall receive the benefit increase described in this subsection beginning on the anniversary date of the special consultant's retirement following September 1, 1997. In no event shall any retroactive annual benefit increases be paid under this subsection to any special consultant who reached the limit provided in subsection 4 of this section prior to August 28, 1997.
6. Each person who is employed for the first time as an administrative law judge or a legal advisor on or after August 28, 1997, and retires shall be entitled annually to a percentage increase in the retirement benefit payable equal to eighty percent of the increase in the consumer price index. Such benefit increase, however, shall not exceed five percent of the retirement benefit payable prior to the increase.
7. Survivors of members described in subsection 6 of this section shall be entitled to the annual benefit increase described in subsection 6 of this section.
8. The compensation provided for in this section shall be payable in equal monthly installments and shall be consolidated with any retirement benefits. The compensation shall be paid from the retirement fund. The retirement fund shall be funded on an actuarial basis for such benefits as prescribed in section 287.845.
452.150. The father and mother living apart are entitled to an adjudication [of] by the circuit court as to their powers, rights and duties in respect to the custody and control and the services and earnings and management of the property of their unmarried minor children without any preference as between the said father and mother, and neither the father nor the mother has any right paramount to that of the other in respect to the custody and control or the services and earnings or of the management of the property of their said unmarried minor children; pending such adjudication the father or mother who actually has the custody and control of said unmarried minor children shall have the sole right to the custody and control and to the services and earnings and to the management of the property of said unmarried minor children.
452.310. 1. All proceedings under sections 452.300 to 452.415 are commenced in the manner provided by the rules of the supreme court.
2. The petition in a proceeding for dissolution of marriage or legal separation shall be verified and shall allege the marriage is irretrievably broken and shall set forth:
(1) The residence of each party and the length of residence in this state;
(2) The date of the marriage and the place at which it was registered;
(3) The date on which the parties separated;
(4) The names, ages, and addresses of any living children of the marriage and whether the wife is pregnant;
(5) Any arrangements as to the custody and support of the children and the maintenance of a spouse; and
(6) The relief sought.
3. In listing the names, ages, and addresses of any living children of the marriage, the party filing the petition shall state which party has actual custody of any minor children, and, upon the filing of the petition, all unemancipated, unmarried minor children shall come under the immediate jurisdiction of the court in which the action is filed, unless a petition alleging abuse or neglect of such minor children is pending in the juvenile court. Thereafter, until permitted to do so by order of the court, neither party shall remove such minor children from the jurisdiction of the court [nor from the care and custody of the party which has custody of the children at the time the action is filed]. The mere fact that one parent has actual custody of the minor children at the time of filing shall not create a preference for the court in its adjudication of custody, visitation and child support.
4. A party shall submit a proposed parenting plan at the time of filing of a motion to modify or a petition involving custody or visitation issues. A party shall submit a proposed parenting plan when filing the answer in such cases or within thirty days after service of a motion to modify. The proposed parenting plan shall set forth the arrangements that the party believes to be in the best interest of the minor children and shall include but not be limited to:
(1) A specific written schedule detailing the residential time for each child with each party including:
(a) Major holidays stating which holidays a party has each year;
(b) School holidays for school age children;
(c) The child's birthday, Mother's Day and Father's Day;
(d) Weekday and weekend schedules and for school age children how the winter, spring, summer and other vacations from school will be spent;
(e) The times and places for transfer of the child between the parties in connection with the residential schedule;
(f) A plan for sharing transportation duties associated with the residential schedule;
(g) Appropriate times for telephone access;
(h) Suggested procedures for notifying the other party when a party requests a temporary variation from the residential schedule;
(i) Any suggested restrictions or limitations on access to a party and the reasons such restrictions are requested;
(2) A specific written plan detailing how the decision-making rights and responsibilities will be shared between the parties including the following:
(a) Educational decisions and methods of communicating information from the school to both parties;
(b) Medical, dental and health care decisions including how health care providers will be selected and a method of communicating medical conditions of the child and how emergency care will be handled;
(c) Extracurricular activities, including a method for determining which activities the child will participate in when those activities involve time during which each party is the custodian;
(d) Child care providers, including how such providers will be selected;
(e) Communication procedures including access to telephone numbers as appropriate;
(f) A dispute resolution procedure for those matters on which the parties disagree or in interpreting the parenting plan;
(g) If a party suggests no shared decision-making, a statement of the reasons for such a request;
(3) How the expenses of the child, including child care, educational and extraordinary expenses as defined in the child support guidelines established by the supreme court, will be paid including:
(a) The suggested amount of child support to be paid by each party;
(b) The party who will maintain or provide health insurance for the child and how the medical, dental, vision, psychological and other health care expenses of the child not paid by insurance will be paid by the parties;
(c) The payment of educational expenses, if any;
(d) The payment of extraordinary expenses of the child, if any;
(e) Child care expenses, if any;
(f) Transportation expenses, if any.
5. If the proposed temporary parenting plans of the parties differ and the parties cannot resolve the differences or if any party fails to file a proposed parenting plan, upon motion of either party and an opportunity for the parties to be heard, the court shall enter a temporary order with a specific residential schedule and specific decision-making authority as well as temporary orders for child support and health insurance for the child which will remain in effect until further order of the court. The temporary order entered by the court shall not create a preference for the court in its adjudication of final custody, child support or visitation.
[4.] 6. The other party must be served in the manner provided by the rules of civil procedure and applicable court rules and may within thirty days after the date of service file a verified answer.
[5.] 7. Previously existing defenses to divorce and legal separation, including but not limited to condonation, connivance, collusion, recrimination, insanity, and lapse of time, are abolished.
452.340. 1. In a proceeding for dissolution of marriage, legal separation or child support, the court may order either or both parents owing a duty of support to a child of the marriage to pay an amount reasonable or necessary for [his] the support of the child, including an award retroactive to the date of filing the petition, without regard to marital misconduct, after considering all relevant factors including:
(1) The financial needs and resources of the child;
(2) The financial resources and needs of the parents;
(3) The standard of living the child would have enjoyed had the marriage not been dissolved;
(4) The physical and emotional condition of the child, and the child's educational needs, including the amount of time the child spends with each parent and the reasonable expenses associated with the custody or visitation arrangements; [and]
(5) The child's physical and legal custody arrangements; and
(6) The reasonable work-related child care expenses of each parent.
2. The obligation of the parent ordered to make support payments shall abate, in whole or in part, for such periods of time in excess of thirty consecutive days that the other parent has voluntarily relinquished physical custody of a child to the parent ordered to pay child support, notwithstanding any periods of visitation or temporary physical and legal or physical or legal custody pursuant to a judgment of dissolution or legal separation or any modification thereof. In a IV-D case, the division of child support enforcement may determine the amount of the abatement under this subsection for any child support order. In such cases, upon notification by the division, the circuit clerk shall record the amount of abatement on the child support trusteeship record established pursuant to this chapter and chapter 454, RSMo.
3. Unless the circumstances of the child manifestly dictate otherwise and the court specifically so provides, the obligation of a parent to make child support payments shall terminate when the child:
(1) Dies;
(2) Marries;
(3) Enters active duty in the military;
(4) Becomes self-supporting, provided that the custodial parent has relinquished the child from parental control by express or implied consent; or
(5) Reaches age eighteen, unless the provisions of subsection 4 or 5 of this section apply.
4. If the child is physically or mentally incapacitated from supporting himself and insolvent and unmarried, the court may extend the parental support obligation past the child's eighteenth birthday.
5. If when a child reaches age eighteen, [he] the child is enrolled in and attending a secondary school program of instruction, the parental support obligation shall continue, if the child continues to attend and progresses toward completion of said program, until the child completes such program or reaches age twenty-one, whichever first occurs. If the child is enrolled in an institution of vocational or higher education not later than October first following graduation from a secondary school or completion of a graduation equivalence degree program and so long as the child enrolls for and completes at least twelve hours of credit each [term] semester, not including the summer semester, at an institution of vocational or higher education and achieves grades sufficient to re-enroll at such institution, the parental support obligation shall continue until the child completes his or her education, or until the child reaches the age of twenty-two, whichever first occurs. To remain eligible for such continued parental support, at the beginning of each semester the child shall submit to each parent a transcript or similar official document provided by the institution of vocational or higher education which includes the courses the child is enrolled in and has completed for each term, the grades and credits received for each such course, and the courses which the child is enrolled in for the upcoming term and the number of credits for each such course. If the circumstances of the child manifestly dictate, the court may waive the October first deadline for enrollment required by this subsection. If the child is enrolled in such an institution, the child or obligated parent may petition the court to amend the order to direct the obligated parent to make the payments directly to the child. As used in this section, an "institution of vocational education" means any postsecondary training or schooling for which the student is assessed a fee and attends classes regularly. "Higher education" means any junior college, college, or university at which the child attends classes regularly. A child who has been diagnosed with a learning disability, or whose physical disability or diagnosed health problem limits the child's ability to carry the number of credit hours prescribed in this subsection, shall remain eligible for child support so long as such child is enrolled in and attending an institution of vocational or higher education, and the child continues to meet the other requirements of this subsection. A child who is employed at least fifteen hours per week during the semester may take as few as nine credit hours per semester and remain eligible for child support so long as all other requirements of this subsection are complied with.
6. [At the parent's option, a parent may pay one-half of the college room, board, tuition, mandatory fees and book expenses of the child as a credit reduction in the amount of child support during the months when a child attends school, if such child is enrolled as a full-time student and living away from the family residence for a majority of the school year, unless provisions for payment of college expenses are specified in the parenting plan or court order; except that, if such payment of college expenses is less than the court-ordered child support, the parent shall pay the difference between such college expenses and the court-ordered payment as provided in the court order.] The court shall consider ordering a parent to waive the right to claim the tax dependency exemption for a child enrolled in an institution of vocational or higher education in favor of the other parent if the application of state and federal tax laws and eligibility for financial aid will make an award of the exemption to the other parent appropriate.
7. The general assembly finds and declares that it is the public policy of this state [to assure that the best interest of the child is] that frequent, continuing and meaningful contact with both parents after the parents have separated or dissolved their marriage is in the best interest of the child except for cases where the court specifically finds that such contact is not in the best interest of the child. In order to effectuate this public policy, a court with jurisdiction shall enforce visitation, custody and child support orders in the same manner. A court with jurisdiction may abate, in whole or in part, any past or future obligation of support and may transfer the physical and legal or physical or legal custody of one or more children if it finds that a parent has, without good cause, failed to provide visitation or physical and legal or physical or legal custody to the other parent pursuant to the terms of a judgment of dissolution, legal separation or modifications thereof. The court [may] shall also award, if requested and for good cause shown, reasonable expenses, attorney's fees and court costs incurred by the prevailing party.
8. Not later than October 13, 1989, the Missouri supreme court shall have in effect a rule establishing guidelines by which any award of child support shall be made in any judicial or administrative proceeding. Said guidelines shall contain specific, descriptive and numeric criteria which will result in a computation of the support obligation. By July 1, 1996, the guidelines shall address how the amount of child support shall be calculated when an award of joint physical custody results in the child or children spending substantially equal time with both parents. Not later than July 1, 1998, the child support guidelines shall be published by the supreme court and specifically list and explain the relevant factors and assumptions that were used to calculate the child support guidelines. Any rule made pursuant to this subsection shall be reviewed by the promulgating body not less than once every three years to ensure that its application results in the determination of appropriate child support award amounts.
9. [Beginning October 13, 1989,] There shall be a rebuttable presumption, in any judicial or administrative proceeding for the award of child support, that the amount of the award which would result from the application of the guidelines established pursuant to subsection 8 of this section is the correct amount of child support to be awarded. A written finding or specific finding on the record in a judicial or administrative proceeding that the application of the guidelines would be unjust or inappropriate in a particular case, after considering all relevant factors, including the factors set out in subsection 1 of this section, is required if requested by a party and shall be sufficient to rebut the presumption in the case. The written finding or specific finding on the record shall detail the specific relevant factors that required a deviation from the application of the guidelines.
10. Under this or any other chapter, when a court determines the amount owed by a parent for support provided to [his] a child by another person prior to the date of filing of a petition requesting support, or when the director of the division of child support enforcement establishes the amount of state debt due under subdivision (2) of subsection 1 of section 454.465, RSMo, the court or director shall use the guidelines established under subsection 8 of this section. The amount of child support resulting from the application of the guidelines shall be applied retroactively for a period prior to the establishment of a support order and the length of the period of retroactivity shall be left to the discretion of the court or director. There shall be a rebuttable presumption that the amount resulting from application of the guidelines under subsection 8 of this section constitutes the amount owed by the parent for the period prior to the date of the filing of the petition for support or the period for which state debt is being established. In applying the guidelines to determine a retroactive support amount, when information as to average monthly income is available, the court or director may use the average monthly income of the noncustodial parent, as averaged over the period of retroactivity, in determining the amount of presumed child support owed for the period of retroactivity. The court or director may enter a different amount in a particular case upon finding, after consideration of all relevant factors, including the factors set out in subsection 1 of this section, that there is sufficient cause to rebut the presumed amount.
452.355. 1. Unless otherwise indicated, the court from time to time after considering all relevant factors including the financial resources of both parties, the merits of the case and the actions of the parties during the pendency of the action, may order a party to pay a reasonable amount for the cost to the other party of maintaining or defending any proceeding under sections 452.300 to 452.415 and for attorney's fees, including sums for legal services rendered and costs incurred prior to the commencement of the proceeding or after entry of judgment. The court may order that the amount be paid directly to the attorney, who may enforce the order in his name.
2. In any proceeding in which the nonpayment of child support is an issue under the provisions of a temporary or permanent court order or decree, if the court finds that the obligor has failed[, without good cause,] to comply with such order or decree to pay the child support, the court shall order the obligor to pay a reasonable amount for the cost of the suit to the obligee, including sums for legal services. The court may order for good cause shown that the amount be paid directly to the attorney, who may enforce the order in his name.
3. For purposes of this section, an "obligor" is a person owing a duty of support and an "obligee" is a person to whom a duty of support is owed.
4. For purposes of this section, "good cause" includes any substantial reason why the defendant is unable to pay the child support as ordered. Good cause does not exist if the defendant purposely maintains his inability to pay.
452.373. 1. In cases involving custody or visitation issues, the court may, except for good cause shown or as provided in subsection 2 of this section, order the parties to the action to participate in an alternate dispute resolution program pursuant to supreme court rule to resolve any issues in dispute or may set a hearing in the matter. As used in this section, "good cause" includes, but is not limited to, noncontested custody or visitation cases, or a prior finding of domestic violence as determined by a court with jurisdiction after all parties have received notice and an opportunity to be heard, but does not mean the absence of qualified mediators.
2. Any alternate dispute resolution program ordered by the court pursuant to subsection 1 of this section shall:
(1) Be paid for by the parties in a proportion to be determined by the court, the cost of which shall be reasonable and customary for the circuit in which the program is ordered;
(2) Not be binding on the parties;
(3) Not be ordered or used for contempt proceedings, for enforcement of existing custody or visitation orders which are unambiguous or which designate specific times or specific periods, or for a motion for a family access order pursuant to section 452.400; and
(4) Not be ordered or utilized for child support issues.
3. Within sixty days after the effective date of this section, the Missouri supreme court shall publish a rule allowing, but not requiring, each circuit to establish an alternate dispute resolution program for contested custody and visitation proceedings within six months of the adoption of the supreme court rule.
452.375. 1. As used in this [section] chapter, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:
(1) "Custody", depending on the context, means joint legal custody, legal custody, joint physical custody or physical custody or any combination thereof;
[(1)] (2) "Joint legal custody" means that the parents share the decision-making rights, responsibilities, and authority relating to the health, education and welfare of the child, and, unless allocated, apportioned, or decreed, the parents shall confer with one another in the exercise of decision-making rights, responsibilities, and authority;
[(2)] (3) "Joint physical custody" means an order awarding each of the parents significant, but not necessarily equal, periods of time during which a child resides with or is under the care and supervision of each of the parents. Joint physical custody shall be shared by the parents in such a way as to assure the child of frequent [and], continuing and meaningful contact with both parents.
2. The court shall determine custody in accordance with the best interests of the child. The court shall consider all relevant factors including:
(1) The wishes of the child's parents as to [his] custody[;
(2) The wishes of a child as to his custodian] and the proposed parenting plans submitted by both parties;
[(3)] (2) The interaction and interrelationship of the child with [his] parents, [his] siblings, and any other person who may significantly affect the child's best interests;
[(4)] (3) The child's adjustment to [his] the child's home, school, and community;
[(5)] (4) The mental and physical health of all individuals involved, including any history of abuse of any individuals involved. If the court finds that a pattern of domestic violence has occurred, and, if the court also finds that awarding custody to the abusive parent is in the best interest of the child, then the court shall enter written findings of fact and conclusions of law. Custody and visitation rights shall be ordered in a manner that best protects the child and the parent or other family or household member who is the victim of domestic violence from any further harm;
[(6)] (5) The needs of the child for a continuing relationship with both parents and the ability and willingness of parents to actively perform their functions as mother and father for the needs of the child;
[(7)] (6) The intention of either parent to relocate [his] the principal residence of the child [outside the state]; [and]
[(8)] (7) Which parent is more likely to allow the child frequent, continuing and meaningful contact with the other parent; and
(8) The wishes of a child as to the child's custodian.
3. The court shall not award custody of a child to a parent if such parent has been found guilty of, or pled guilty to, a felony violation of chapter 566, RSMo, when the child was the victim, or a violation of section 568.020, RSMo, when the child was the victim.
4. The general assembly finds and declares that it is the public policy of this state [to assure children] that frequent, continuing and meaningful contact with both parents after the parents have separated or dissolved their marriage is in the best interest of the child, except for cases where the court specifically finds that such contact is not in the best interest of the child, and that it is in the public interest to encourage parents to share decision-making rights and responsibilities of child rearing. In order to effectuate this policy, the court shall determine the custody arrangement which will best assure that parents share such decision-making responsibility and authority and such frequent, continuing and meaningful contact between the child and each parent, as is indicated in the best interests of the child under all relevant circumstances.
5. Prior to awarding the appropriate custody arrangement in the best interest of the child, the court shall consider [each of the following as follows] custody awards in the order of preference listed in subdivisions (1) to (5) of this subsection, except where there are no custody issues in dispute. The burden of coming forward with evidence that a particular custodial arrangement is not in the best interest of the child shall be upon the parent opposing such an award. In the event the court finds that a preferred custodial arrangement is not in the child's best interest and upon the request of a party, the court shall enter a written finding detailing the specific relevant factors that made such an arrangement not in the child's best interest and shall specify the custodial arrangement which the court finds is in the child's best interest. The order of preference shall be:
(1) Joint physical and joint legal custody to both parents, which shall not be denied solely for the reason that one parent opposes a joint physical and joint legal custody award. The residence of one of the parents shall be designated as the mailing address of the child;
(2) Joint physical custody with one party granted sole legal custody. The residence of one of the parents shall be designated as the mailing address of the child;
(3) Joint legal custody with one party granted sole physical custody;
(4) Sole custody to either parent; or
[(3)] (5) Third party custody or visitation:
(a) When the court finds that each parent is unfit, unsuitable, or unable to be a custodian, or the welfare of the child requires, and it is in the best interests of the child, then custody, temporary custody or visitation may be awarded to any other person or persons deemed by the court to be suitable and able to provide an adequate and stable environment for the child. Before the court awards custody, temporary custody or visitation to a third person under this subdivision, the court shall make that person a party to the action;
(b) Under the provisions of this subsection, any person may petition the court to intervene as a party in interest at any time as provided by supreme court rule.
6. Unless otherwise decreed, parents are obligated to exchange information with one another concerning the health, education and welfare of the child. In a decree of sole legal custody, [a court may provide that parents] unless the court specifically declares otherwise, the legal custodian shall [confer with one another in the exercise of decision-making rights, responsibilities and authority] discuss with the other parent any significant decision affecting the health, education or welfare of the child. Upon a finding by the court that either parent has refused to exchange information with one another, which shall include but not be limited to the health, education and welfare of the child, the court shall order the parent to comply immediately and to pay the prevailing party a sum equal to the prevailing party's cost associated with obtaining the requested information, which shall include but not be limited to attorney's fees and court costs.
7. As between the parents of a child, no preference may be given to either parent in the awarding of custody because of that parent's age, sex, or financial status, nor because of the age or sex of the child.
8. Any decree providing for joint custody shall include a specific written plan setting forth the terms of such custody. Such plan may be suggested by both parents acting in concert, or one parent acting individually, or if neither of the foregoing occurs, the plan shall be provided by the court. The plan may include a provision for mediation of disputes. In all cases, the joint custody plan approved and ordered by the court shall be in the court's discretion and shall be in the best interest of the child.
9. Unless [a noncustodial] a parent has been denied custody rights under section 452.375 or visitation rights under section 452.400, any judgment or decree of dissolution or other applicable court order shall, after August 28, 1998, specifically allow both parents access to records and information pertaining to a minor child, including, but not limited to, medical, dental, and school records[, shall not be denied to a parent because the parent is not the child's custodial parent]. If [a noncustodial] the parent without custody has been granted restricted or supervised visitation because the court has found that the [custodial] parent with custody or the child has been the victim of domestic violence, as defined in section 455.200, RSMo, by the [noncustodial] parent without custody, the court may order that the reports and records made available pursuant to this subsection not include the address of the [custodial] parent with custody or the child.
10. If any individual, professional, public or private institution or organization denies access or fails to provide or disclose any and all records and information, including, but not limited to, past and present dental, medical and school records pertaining to a minor child, to either [the custodial or noncustodial] parent upon the written request of such parent, the court shall, upon its finding that the individual, professional, public or private institution or organization denied such request without good cause, order that party to comply immediately with such request and to pay to the prevailing party all costs incurred, including, but not limited to, attorney's fees and court costs associated with obtaining the requested information.
11. An award of joint custody does not preclude an award of child support pursuant to section 452.340 and applicable supreme court rules. The court shall consider the factors contained in section 452.340 and applicable supreme court rules in determining an amount reasonable or necessary for the support of the child.
12. If the court finds that domestic violence has occurred, the court shall make specific findings of fact to show that the custody or visitation arrangement ordered by the court best protects the child and the parent or other family or household member who is the victim of domestic violence from any further harm.
452.377. 1. For purposes of this section and section 452.375, "relocate" or "relocation" means a change in the principal residence of a child for a period of ninety days or more, but does not include a temporary absence from the principal residence.
2. The residence of the child or any party entitled to custody or visitation of the child shall not be changed without first providing written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, to any party with custody or visitation rights. Absent exigent circumstances as determined by a court with jurisdiction, written notice shall be provided at least sixty days in advance of the proposed relocation. The notice of the proposed relocation shall include the following information:
(1) The intended new residence, including the specific address and mailing address, if known, and if not known, the city;
(2) The home telephone number of the new residence, if known;
(3) The date of the intended move or proposed relocation;
(4) A brief statement of the specific reasons for the proposed relocation of a child, if applicable; and
(5) A proposal for a revised schedule of custody or visitation with the child, if applicable.
3. A [person] party entitled to the custody of a child shall not [change] relocate the principal residence of the child to another state, or remove the child from this state for a period of time exceeding ninety days, or relocate the principal residence of the child more than fifty miles from the current principal residence of the child except upon order of the court or with the written consent of the parties with custody or visitation rights. Where [the noncustodial person] a party has been given custody or visitation rights by the custody decree, such court permission may be granted only after notice to the [person] party having custody or visitation rights and after opportunity for hearing.
4. A party required to give notice of a proposed relocation pursuant to subsection 2 of this section has a continuing duty to provide a change in or addition to the information required by this section as soon as such information becomes known.
5. In exceptional circumstances where the court makes a finding that the health or safety of any adult or child would be unreasonably placed at risk by the disclosure of the required identifying information concerning a proposed relocation of the child, the court may order that:
(1) The specific residence address and telephone number of the child, parent or person, and other identifying information shall not be disclosed in the pleadings, notice, other documents filed in the proceeding or the final order except for an in cameral disclosure;
(2) The notice requirements provided by this section shall be waived to the extent necessary to protect the health or safety of a child or any adult; or
(3) Any other remedial action the court considers necessary to facilitate the legitimate needs of the parties and the best interest of the child.
6. The court shall consider a failure to provide notice of a proposed relocation of a child as:
(1) A factor in determining whether custody and visitation should be modified;
(2) A basis for ordering the return of the child if the relocation occurs without notice; and
(3) Sufficient cause to order the party seeking to relocate the child to pay reasonable expenses and attorneys fees incurred by the party objecting to the relocation.
7. If the parties agree to a revised schedule of custody or visitation, they may submit the terms of such agreement to the court with a written affidavit signed by the parties assenting to the terms of the agreement and the court may order the revised schedule without a hearing.
8. The party seeking to relocate shall have the burden of proving that the proposed relocation is made in good faith and is in the best interest of the child.
9. If relocation is permitted:
(1) The court shall order contact with the nonrelocating party including custody or visitation and telephone access sufficient to assure that the child has frequent, continuing and meaningful contact with the nonrelocating party unless the child's best interest warrant otherwise; and
(2) The court shall specify how the transportation costs will be allocated between the parties and adjust the child support, as appropriate, considering the costs of transportation.
10. After August 28, 1998, every court order establishing or modifying custody or visitation shall include the following language: "Absent exigent circumstances as determined by a court with jurisdiction, you, as a party to this action, are ordered to notify, in writing by certified mail, return receipt requested, and at least sixty days prior to the proposed relocation, each party to this action of any proposed relocation of the principal residence of the child, including the following information:
(1) The intended new residence, including the specific address and mailing address, if known, and if not known, the city;
(2) The home telephone number of the new residence, if known;
(3) The date of the intended move or proposed relocation;
(4) A brief statement of the specific reasons for the proposed relocation of the child; and
(5) A proposal for a revised schedule of custody or visitation with the child.
Your obligation to provide this information to each party continues as long as you or any other party by virtue of this order is entitled to custody of a child covered by this order. Your failure to obey the order of this court regarding the proposed relocation may result in further litigation to enforce such order, including contempt of court. In addition, your failure to notify a party of a relocation of the child may be considered in a proceeding to modify custody or visitation with the child. Reasonable costs and attorney fees shall be assessed against you if you fail to give the required notice."
11. Violation of the provisions of this section or a court order under this section may be deemed a change of circumstance under section 452.410, allowing the court to modify the prior custody decree. In addition, the court may utilize any and all powers relating to contempt conferred on it by law or rule of the Missouri supreme court.
12. Any party who objects in good faith to the relocation of a child's principle residence shall not be ordered to pay the costs and attorney's fees of the party seeking to relocate.
452.400. 1. A parent not granted custody of the child is entitled to reasonable visitation rights unless the court finds, after a hearing, that visitation would endanger the child's physical health or impair his emotional development. [The court shall define the noncustodial parent's visitation periods in detail at the request of either party.] The court shall enter an order specifically detailing the visitation rights of the parent without physical custody rights. In determining the granting of visitation rights, the court shall consider evidence of domestic violence. If the court finds that domestic violence has occurred, the court may find that granting visitation to the abusive party is in the best interests of the child. The court shall not grant visitation to the parent not granted custody if such parent has been found guilty of or pled guilty to a felony violation of chapter 566, RSMo, when the child was the victim, or a violation of section 568.020, RSMo, when the child was the victim or an offense committed in another state, when the child is the victim, that would be a felony violation of chapter 566, RSMo, or section 568.020, RSMo, if committed in Missouri. The court shall consider the parent's history of inflicting, or tendency to inflict, physical harm, bodily injury, assault, or the fear of physical harm, bodily injury, or assault on other persons and shall grant visitation in a manner that best protects the child and the parent or other family or household member who is the victim of domestic violence from any further harm. The court, if requested by a party, shall make specific findings of fact to show that the visitation arrangements made by the court best protects the child or the parent or other family or household member who is the victim of domestic violence from any further harm.
2. The court may modify an order granting or denying visitation rights whenever modification would serve the best interests of the child, but the court shall not restrict a parent's visitation rights unless it finds that the visitation would endanger the child's physical health or impair his emotional development. When a court restricts a parent's visitation rights or when a court orders supervised visitation because of allegations of abuse or domestic violence, a showing of proof of treatment and rehabilitation shall be made to the court before unsupervised visitation may be ordered. "Supervised visitation", as used in this section, is visitation which takes place in the presence of a responsible adult appointed by the court for the protection of the child.
3. The court shall mandate compliance with its order by both [the custodial parent] parents and the child. [In the event of noncompliance,] If a parent has been granted specific or unambiguous visitation or custody rights, and such specific or unambiguous rights are denied or interfered with by the other parent, without good cause, the [noncustodial] parent having specific or unambiguous visitation or custody rights may file a motion for contempt[.] or a motion for a family access order.
4. By January 1, 1999, the state courts administrator shall develop a simplified form and instructions for use by persons filing pro se motions for family access orders pursuant to this section. The cost of filing the motion shall be the standard court costs plus a fee not to exceed twenty-five dollars. Motions for family access orders pursuant to this section shall be summarily heard, except as otherwise provided by this section, in the manner provided by sections 517.021 to 517.151, RSMo, by judges of the circuit court or by any commissioner of the circuit court authorized to hear such motions for family access orders. No continuance of a hearing relating to such a motion for a family access order shall be granted by the court except for extraordinary cause. Final disposition of the motion shall take place not more than forty-five days after service of such motion, except for good cause shown as determined by the court or by waiver of the parties. Final disposition shall not include appellate review.
5. Upon a finding by the court that its order for visitation or custody has not been complied with, without good cause, the court shall [define the noncustodial parent's visitation in detail and shall exercise its discretion in providing] provide a remedy, which shall include, but not be limited to, a compensatory period of visitation or [temporary] custody at a time convenient for the [noncustodial] parent denied visitation or custody not less than the period of time denied, [together with] and, if requested by a party and for good cause shown, a mandatory judgment in an amount not less than the reasonable expenses and court costs actually incurred by the [noncustodial] parent as a result of the denial of visitation or custody. Such order may include a provision that the sheriff or other law enforcement officer shall enforce the rights of either parent to custody or visitation, as the case may be, unless the court issues a subsequent order pursuant to chapters 210 or 211, RSMo, to limit or deny either parent's access to the child.
[4.] 6. The reasonable expenses, attorney's fees and court costs actually incurred as a result of a proceeding to enforce visitation or custody rights shall, if requested by a party and for good cause shown, be assessed against the parent who [unreasonably], without good cause, denies or interferes with visitation or custody. In addition, the court may utilize any and all powers relating to contempt conferred on it by law or rule of the Missouri supreme court.
7. The intentional denial or interference with visitation or custody of a child from the other parent, without good cause, shall constitute a change of circumstances which may justify a modification of custody.
8. For purposes of supreme court rule 51, motions filed pursuant to this section shall not be deemed to be an independent civil action if the judge or commissioner designated to rule on the motion is the same judge or commissioner that entered the order which is the subject of a motion for a family access order or contempt."; and
Further amend said bill, Page 21, Section 452.402, Line 20 of said page, by inserting immediately after all of said line the following:
"452.405. 1. Except as otherwise ordered by the court or agreed by the parties in writing at the time of the custody decree, the legal custodian may determine the child's upbringing, including his education, health care, and religious training, unless the court after hearing[,] finds, upon motion by the [noncustodial] parent without legal custody, that in the absence of a specific limitation of the legal custodian's authority the child's physical health would be endangered or his emotional development impaired.
2. The legal custodian shall not exercise legal custody in such a way as to significantly and detrimentally impact the other parent's visitation or custody rights.
[2.] 3. The court may order the county welfare office or the county juvenile officer to exercise continuing supervision over the case.
452.411. If either parent of a child changes his residence to another state, such change of residence of the parent shall be deemed a change of circumstances under section 452.410, allowing the court to modify a prior visitation or custody decree.
452.416. 1. Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, whenever a parent in emergency military service has a change in income due to such military service, such change in income shall be considered a change in circumstances so substantial and continuing as to make the terms of any order or judgment for child support or visitation unreasonable.
2. Upon receipt of a notarized letter from the commanding officer of a noncustodial parent in emergency military service which contains the date of the commencement of emergency military service and the compensation of the parent in emergency military service, the director of the division of child support enforcement shall take appropriate action to seek modification of the order or judgment of child support in accordance with the guidelines and criteria set forth in section 452.340 and applicable supreme court [rule 88.01] rules. Such notification to the director shall constitute an application for services under section 454.425, RSMo.
3. Upon return from emergency military service the parent shall notify the director of the division of child support enforcement who shall take appropriate action to seek modification of the order or judgment of child support in accordance with the guidelines and criteria set forth in section 452.340 and applicable supreme court [rule 88.01] rules. Such notification to the director shall constitute an application for services under section 454.425, RSMo.
4. As used in this section, the term "emergency military service" means that the parent is a member of a reserve unit or national guard unit which is called into active military duty for a period of more than thirty days.
452.423. 1. In all proceedings for child custody or for dissolution of marriage or legal separation where custody, visitation, or support of a child is a contested issue, the court may appoint a guardian ad litem. The court shall appoint a guardian ad litem in any proceeding in which child abuse or neglect is alleged. Disqualification of a guardian ad litem shall be ordered upon the filing of a written application by any party within ten days of appointment, or at least ten days before trial if the appointment occurs prior to the effective date of this act. Each party shall be entitled to one disqualification of a guardian ad litem in each proceeding, except a party may be entitled to more than one disqualification of a guardian ad litem for good cause shown.
2. The guardian ad litem shall:
(1) Be the legal representative of the child at the hearing, and may examine, cross-examine, subpoena witnesses and offer testimony;
(2) Prior to the hearing, conduct all necessary interviews with persons having contact with or knowledge of the child in order to ascertain the child's wishes, feelings, attachments and attitudes. If appropriate, the child should be interviewed;
(3) Request the juvenile officer to cause a petition to be filed in the juvenile division of the circuit court if the guardian ad litem believes the child alleged to be abused or neglected is in danger.
3. The appointing judge shall require the guardian ad litem to faithfully discharge such guardian ad litem's duties, and upon failure to do so shall discharge such guardian ad litem and appoint another. The judge in making appointments pursuant to this section shall give preference to persons who served as guardian ad litem for the child in the earlier proceeding, unless there is a reason on the record for not giving such preference.
4. The guardian ad litem shall be awarded a reasonable fee for such services to be set by the court. The court, in its discretion, may award such fees as a judgment to be paid by any party to the proceedings or from public funds. Such an award of guardian fees shall constitute a final judgment in favor of the guardian ad litem. Such final judgment shall be enforceable against the parties in accordance with chapter 513, RSMo.
5. The court may designate volunteer advocates, who may or may not be attorneys licensed to practice law, to assist in the performance of the guardian ad litem duties for the court. The volunteer advocate shall be provided with all reports relevant to the case made to or by any agency or person and shall have access to all records of such agencies or persons relating to the child or such child's family members. Any such designated person shall receive no compensation from public funds. This shall not preclude reimbursement for reasonable expenses.
452.490. 1. The court may order any party to the proceeding who is in this state to appear personally before the court. If the court finds the physical presence of the child in court to be in the best interests of the child, the court may order that the party who has physical custody of the child appear personally with the child.
2. If a party to the proceeding whose presence is desired by the court is outside this state, with or without the child, the court may order that the notice given under section 452.460 include a statement directing that party to appear personally with or without the child.
3. If a party to the proceeding who is outside this state is directed to appear under subsection [2] 1 of this section or desires to appear personally before the court with or without the child, the court may require another party to pay to the clerk of the court travel and other necessary expenses of the party so appearing and of the child, if this is just and proper under the circumstances.
4. If the court finds it to be in the best interest of the child that a guardian ad litem be appointed, the court may appoint a guardian ad litem for the child. The guardian ad litem so appointed shall be an attorney licensed to practice law in the state of Missouri. Disqualification of a guardian ad litem shall be ordered upon the filing of a written application by any party within ten days of appointment, or at least ten days before trial if the appointment occurs prior to the effective date of this act. Each party shall be entitled to one disqualification of a guardian ad litem in each proceeding, except a party may be entitled to more than one disqualification of a guardian ad litem for good cause shown. The guardian ad litem may, for the purpose of determining custody of the child only, participate in the proceedings as if such guardian ad litem were a party. The court shall enter judgment allowing a reasonable fee to the guardian ad litem.
452.600. The circuit courts [of the fifth, sixth, twenty-third, twenty-ninth, thirtieth, thirty-first and thirty-eighth judicial circuits], by local rule, may establish a program of educational sessions for parties to actions for dissolution of marriage or in postjudgment proceedings involving custody or support, concerning the effects of dissolution of marriage on minor children of the marriage. In lieu of establishing such a program, the circuit court may, by local rule, designate a similar program of educational sessions offered by a private or public entity.
452.605. In an action for dissolution of marriage involving minor children, or in a postjudgment proceeding wherein custody [or support] of minor children is to be determined by the court, the court may [on its own motion], except for good cause, order the parties, including the minor children, to attend educational sessions concerning the effects of custody and the dissolution of marriage on children[, if the court finds that doing so would be in the best interests of the minor children]. As used in this section "good cause" includes, but is not limited to, situations where the parties have stipulated to the custody and visitation of the child, or a finding by a court with jurisdiction after all parties have received notice and an opportunity to be heard that the safety of a party or child may be endangered by attending the educational sessions."; and
Further amend said bill, Page 43, Section 453.170, Line 23 of said page, by inserting immediately after all of said line the following:
"454.390. The division shall [respond within five business days to] use high-volume automated administrative enforcement, to the same extent as used in intrastate cases, in response to a request made by another state child support agency to enforce a support order and promptly report the results to the requesting state. If the division provides assistance to another state in such a case, neither this state nor the requesting state shall consider the case to be transferred to its caseload; however, the division shall maintain records of the number of such interstate requests for assistance, the number of cases for which support was collected and the amounts of such collections. The division is authorized to transmit to another state, by electronic or other means, a request for assistance in a case involving the enforcement of a support order. Such request shall:
(1) Include information to enable the receiving state to compare the information about the case to the information in state databases; and
(2) Constitute a certification by the division of the arrearage amount under the order and that the division has complied with all applicable procedural due process requirements as provided for in this chapter.
454.408. The division of child support enforcement:
(1) Shall determine whether a person who has applied for or is receiving assistance from a program funded pursuant to Part A or Part E of Title IV of the Social Security Act, [or] Title XIX of the Social Security Act or the Food Stamp Act is cooperating in good faith with the division in establishing the paternity of, or in establishing, modifying or enforcing a support order for any child of such person by providing the division with the name of the noncustodial parent or any other information the division may require. The division may, by regulation, excuse compliance with the provisions of this subsection on a case-by-case basis for good cause or other exceptions as the division may deem to be in the best interest of the child;
(2) Shall require as a condition of cooperation that such person supply additional information deemed necessary by the division and appear at any interviews, hearings or legal proceedings;
(3) Shall require as a condition of cooperation that such person and such person's child submit to genetic testing pursuant to a judicial or administrative order;
(4) May request that such person sign a voluntary acknowledgment of paternity, after notice of the rights and consequences of such an acknowledgment, but may not require such person to sign an acknowledgment or otherwise relinquish the right to a genetic test as a condition of cooperation and eligibility for assistance from a state program funded pursuant to Part A or Part E of Title IV of the Social Security Act, [or] Title XIX of the Social Security Act or the Food Stamp Act; and
(5) Shall promptly notify such person, the division of family services or the division of medical services of every determination made pursuant to this section, including a determination that such person is not cooperative and the basis for such determination.
454.413. 1. Each party to a paternity or child support proceeding establishing, modifying or enforcing a support order pursuant to chapter 210, RSMo, chapter 211, RSMo, chapter 452, RSMo, or chapter 454, shall file with the [court or division where such proceeding is pending, and with the court or division for the] state case registry upon entry of an order, information on the location and identity of such party including the party's social security number, residential address, mailing address, telephone number, driver's license number and the name, address and telephone number of the party's employer. If such information changes, such party shall provide the new information to the [court or division] state case registry within thirty days of any such change.
2. In any subsequent child support enforcement action between the parties, the court or division [may] shall deem that the due process requirements for notice and service of process are met with respect to such party upon a sufficient showing that diligent effort has been made to ascertain the location of a party including written notice by certified mail to the last known address of the party and attempted service by publication, and written notice has been delivered to the most recent residential or employer address of such party filed with the [court or division] state case registry.
454.432. 1. The circuit clerk shall record credits on child support trusteeship records established pursuant to this chapter or chapter 452, RSMo, for amounts not received by the clerk only to the extent permitted by this section.
2. Credits allowed under this section shall include, but not be limited to, in-kind payments as provided in this section, amounts collected from an obligor from federal and state income tax refunds, state lottery payments, social security payments, unemployment and workers' compensation benefits, income withholdings authorized by law, liens, garnishment actions, and any other amounts required to be credited by statute or case law.
3. Credits shall be recorded on the trusteeship record for payments received by the division of child support enforcement and, at the discretion of the division of child support enforcement, and upon receipt of waivers requested pursuant to subsection 4 of this section, credits may be given on state debt judgments obtained pursuant to subsection 1 of section 454.465 for completion of such activities as job training and education, if mutually agreed upon by the division and the obligor. The circuit clerk shall make such credits upon receipt of paper or electronic documentation of the amount of the credit from the division and verification of the authenticity of the documentation by the circuit clerk.
4. The director of the department of social services shall apply to the United States Secretary of Health and Human Services for all waivers of requirements under federal law necessary to implement the provisions of subsection 3 of this section.
5. Credits shall be entered on the trusteeship record for direct and in-kind payments received by the custodial parent when [all parties to the support order file] the custodial parent files an affidavit stating the particulars of the direct and in-kind payments to be credited on the court record with the circuit clerk; however, no such credits shall be entered for periods during which child support payments are assigned to the state pursuant to law. Such credits may include, but shall not be limited to, partial and complete satisfaction of judgment for support arrearages.
6. Nothing contained in this section shall prohibit satisfaction of judgment as provided for in sections 511.570 to 511.620, RSMo, and by supreme court rule.
7. Application for the federal earned income tax credit shall, when applicable, be required as a condition of participating in the alternative child support credit programs of subsection 3 of this section.
454.440. 1. As used in this section, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, the following terms mean:
(1) "Business" includes any corporation, partnership, association, individual, and labor or other organization including, but not limited to, a public utility or cable company;
(2) "Division", the Missouri division of child support enforcement of the department of social services;
(3) "Financial entity" includes any bank, trust company, savings and loan association, credit union, insurance company, or any corporation, association, partnership, or individual receiving or accepting money or its equivalent on deposit as a business;
(4) "Government agency", any department, board, bureau or other agency of this state or any political subdivision of the state;
(5) "Information" includes, but is not necessarily limited to, the following items:
(a) Full name of the parent;
(b) Social security number of the parent;
(c) Date of birth of the parent;
(d) Last known mailing and residential address of the parent;
(e) Amount of wages, salaries, earnings or commissions earned by or paid to the parent;
(f) Number of dependents declared by the parent on state and federal tax information and reporting forms;
(g) Name of company, policy numbers and dependent coverage for any medical insurance carried by or