SB 700 Modifies provisions relating to employee wages
Sponsor: Sifton
LR Number: 4433S.01I Fiscal Notes
Committee: Small Business and Industry
Last Action: 2/20/2018 - Hearing Conducted S Small Business and Industry Committee Journal Page:
Title: Calendar Position:
Effective Date: August 28, 2018

Full Bill Text | All Actions | Amendments/CCRs/CCSs | Available Summaries | Senate Home Page | List of 2018 Senate Bills

Current Bill Summary


SB 700 - Under current law, no employer shall pay any female wage rates less than the wage rates paid to male employees for the same quantity and quality of the same classification of work. This act prohibits any employer from paying an employee of any gender wages less than those paid to employees of the opposite gender for the same work performed under similar working conditions. Certain wage payment differentials are exempted from these civil actions when they are based on merit systems, regional economic factors, factors that measure pay due to output, or other bona fide factors other than gender. Employers are prohibited from reducing wages to comply with these provisions.

The act redefines wages to include all compensation and specifically includes bonuses, stock options, awards or tips, non-monetary compensation, and any compensation that has economic value to an employee.

Employers are prohibited from retaliating against employees who utilize the protections of this act. Furthermore, employees may file a civil action for actual and compensatory damages for such retaliation.

The act creates a civil cause of action for violations of the provisions of this act. Employees may seek recovery of actual and compensatory damages, not to exceed twice the wages awarded, for any unlawful gender-based pay practice. Courts are authorized to issue an injunction against employers for violation of the provisions of the act. This act allows for the recovery of attorney fees and court costs in any civil action brought under this section and abolishes the six-month statute of limitations for filing an action.

This act is identical to SB 205 (2017), SB 350 (2017), SB 695 (2016), SB 247 (2015), SB 873 (2004) and HB 1069 (2002), substantially similar to SB 1064 (2018), HB 2190 (2018), HB 518 (2017), HB 559 (2017), SB 952 (2016), HB 2249 (2016), HB 2356 (2016), HB 2370 (2016), HB 2403 (2016), and HB 2660 (2016), and similar to HB 349 (2011), SB 647 (2010), and HB 1962 (2010).

SCOTT SVAGERA